MagnifyMobile
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? NJ
I am having a dispute with a landlord who seems to want unrestricted access to my home. He has already entered illegally without any prior notice or consent, while doing so he set off my alarm system causing the police to arrive. No charges were pressed. Since then I have installed a lock on my basement door since I have things down there I want secure, and the police said I can't have an alarm on a door that didn't have a lock. I got a notice to cease letter from the landlord's attorney saying that I have to give him keys and an alarm code so he can get in the property for emergencies or to make repairs. Of course any time I have needed a repair he dragged his feet for months with me constantly calling him, and eventually threatening to file complaints in landlord tenant court to force him to make repairs. Here is the thing. The landlord owns a small hole in the wall car dealership. I just found out that he used my roommate's personal information and tried to take out a fraudulent auto loan in his name. This has been turned over to the police and I'm sure they will be speaking with him shortly. This guy is a real dirty guy and I don't feel comfortable just handing over unregulated access so he can just walk in my home anytime he wants and steal stuff from me. He has made it clear that he does not care what the law says, his motto is "it's my property, it's my law, I don't give a f%%k what NJ law says". At the same time I do realize that I have some responsibility to provide a reasonable means to enter if there is an emergency, and obviously if a repair is needed I will open the door for him. I have googled this exhaustively and have found no law that specifically say that I have to give him a key and alarm code, but I do see that I can't just flat out refuse him access either. So the question is what defines "reasonable access" in the eyes of the law?
Here is what I believe should be an acceptable solution. I can have an outdoor lock box installed that will contain the keys to the property, in which I will give the landlord the combination to open. The box will be connected to my alarm system and if opened the monitoring company will automatically be notified. To do myself one better if there is ever a fire or burglary, the alarm company can even provide the police or fire department with the combo to retrieve the keys as well if appropriate. So this way if there is some sort of an emergency that requires the landlord to enter immediately, he can simply use his combination to do so. That way I can know that he will only be entering in an emergency, and he will know that he will not be denied entry. Is this reasonable?
Not that it has much to do with it, but I can't think of any scenario where he would need to enter in an emergency without me actually not knowing first. He actually asked me "what if you have a pipe break, how can I get in to shut the water off?" Keep in mind this is an entire single family house that I am renting, with no connecting neighbors. My response to him was "how would you even know if a pipe broke if you are not even inside of the house?". He jammed right up and couldn't think of an answer. Of course recently in retaliation against me he actually shut my water off for almost 24 hours, so it seems that even if this pipe breaking scenario did take place, he has some kind of exterior means to turn off the water. Anyway at this point I simply want to do what I need to do to maintain the security of my property while making sure I am not breaking the law.
I am having a dispute with a landlord who seems to want unrestricted access to my home. He has already entered illegally without any prior notice or consent, while doing so he set off my alarm system causing the police to arrive. No charges were pressed. Since then I have installed a lock on my basement door since I have things down there I want secure, and the police said I can't have an alarm on a door that didn't have a lock. I got a notice to cease letter from the landlord's attorney saying that I have to give him keys and an alarm code so he can get in the property for emergencies or to make repairs. Of course any time I have needed a repair he dragged his feet for months with me constantly calling him, and eventually threatening to file complaints in landlord tenant court to force him to make repairs. Here is the thing. The landlord owns a small hole in the wall car dealership. I just found out that he used my roommate's personal information and tried to take out a fraudulent auto loan in his name. This has been turned over to the police and I'm sure they will be speaking with him shortly. This guy is a real dirty guy and I don't feel comfortable just handing over unregulated access so he can just walk in my home anytime he wants and steal stuff from me. He has made it clear that he does not care what the law says, his motto is "it's my property, it's my law, I don't give a f%%k what NJ law says". At the same time I do realize that I have some responsibility to provide a reasonable means to enter if there is an emergency, and obviously if a repair is needed I will open the door for him. I have googled this exhaustively and have found no law that specifically say that I have to give him a key and alarm code, but I do see that I can't just flat out refuse him access either. So the question is what defines "reasonable access" in the eyes of the law?
Here is what I believe should be an acceptable solution. I can have an outdoor lock box installed that will contain the keys to the property, in which I will give the landlord the combination to open. The box will be connected to my alarm system and if opened the monitoring company will automatically be notified. To do myself one better if there is ever a fire or burglary, the alarm company can even provide the police or fire department with the combo to retrieve the keys as well if appropriate. So this way if there is some sort of an emergency that requires the landlord to enter immediately, he can simply use his combination to do so. That way I can know that he will only be entering in an emergency, and he will know that he will not be denied entry. Is this reasonable?
Not that it has much to do with it, but I can't think of any scenario where he would need to enter in an emergency without me actually not knowing first. He actually asked me "what if you have a pipe break, how can I get in to shut the water off?" Keep in mind this is an entire single family house that I am renting, with no connecting neighbors. My response to him was "how would you even know if a pipe broke if you are not even inside of the house?". He jammed right up and couldn't think of an answer. Of course recently in retaliation against me he actually shut my water off for almost 24 hours, so it seems that even if this pipe breaking scenario did take place, he has some kind of exterior means to turn off the water. Anyway at this point I simply want to do what I need to do to maintain the security of my property while making sure I am not breaking the law.