jbdesign82
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? West Virginia
I know it seems there is an obvious answer to this, but here's my dilemma. I am starting a business creating tee shirts with graphics that are applied using a heat press. The graphics would not be printed and pressed onto the shirt until a customer purchased it online. In other words, the physical item for resale (the shirts) would not exist until after a purchase is made and payment received.
I am asking this because I am using licensed images for the shirts. I have two licensing options for the images. For $1 I can use the image for ads, print, web, etc. but not on items for resale. For $25 I can use the image however I want, including unlimited items for commercial resale.
So, if I purchased the $1 license and put the images on my website advertising them as shirts, but only upgrading to a $25 license after the first purchase was made that used that particular image, would this likely be in violation of the license?
One sale might not cover the entire $25 license fee, but this method of production would at least allow me to avoid paying the license fee on graphics that may never sell a single shirt. I would be using it for advertising, which is permissible with the $1 license, but I would only use it to produce the physical item for resale once I upgraded the license after the first purchase. If no physical item is ever produced with the graphic, to me it would not be in violation, but I have a biased incentive to believe that.
What are your thoughts?
I know it seems there is an obvious answer to this, but here's my dilemma. I am starting a business creating tee shirts with graphics that are applied using a heat press. The graphics would not be printed and pressed onto the shirt until a customer purchased it online. In other words, the physical item for resale (the shirts) would not exist until after a purchase is made and payment received.
I am asking this because I am using licensed images for the shirts. I have two licensing options for the images. For $1 I can use the image for ads, print, web, etc. but not on items for resale. For $25 I can use the image however I want, including unlimited items for commercial resale.
So, if I purchased the $1 license and put the images on my website advertising them as shirts, but only upgrading to a $25 license after the first purchase was made that used that particular image, would this likely be in violation of the license?
One sale might not cover the entire $25 license fee, but this method of production would at least allow me to avoid paying the license fee on graphics that may never sell a single shirt. I would be using it for advertising, which is permissible with the $1 license, but I would only use it to produce the physical item for resale once I upgraded the license after the first purchase. If no physical item is ever produced with the graphic, to me it would not be in violation, but I have a biased incentive to believe that.
What are your thoughts?