according to the national highway traffic safety administration, "because the devices are not target specific, but rely on the operator for accuracy, they are more difficult to use in congested areas. training can help officers use radar in congested trafic areas but will be more difficult than using it in less congested areas." So you know it all aka moron lol the law is about interpretation so to me them saying "it is difficult to use" means reasonable doubt as i was in the far left lane and it is reasonable to assume there were at least one or more cars in the middle or far right lane which his radar could have hit so bingo NOT GUILTY. thanks for nothing, i figured it out myself as usual ;-)
KeepKeep in mind some of these poster's are not knowledgeable at all in traffic law or US constitutional law (burden of proof, foundation for evidence, etc) - there subscribe to a feudal lord system in which everyone is guilty
They don't care what the International Association of Chiefs of Police or the National Highway Transportation Safety Admin or the Case law says
Keep in mind in PA - They have testing center for the Radar units themselves...and have a foundational requirement to bring in the certified copy of the current calibration report...
http://members.aol.com/StatutesP1/75PA3368.html
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Gail DENNY, Appellant.
"We therefore hold that in order for results of a radar device to be properly admissible at trial, the Commonwealth must offer evidence, independent of the certificate of accuracy, to show that the testing facility has been appointed by the Department of Transportation as an official testing station pursuant to the requirements of section 3368(d) of [372 Pa.Super. 323] the Vehicle Code. This independent evidence may consist of either a separate document from the Secretary of Transportation under seal or a citation to the Pennsylvania Bulletin which lists the station as an official testing station.
Judgment of sentence vacated."
Email or Private Message me and I can get you the case law...
There is a chance of (A) the officer not showing, (B) the officer not bringing the proper documentation - they often "forget" this requirement for various reasons, and (C) even if convicted the judge gives you some relief just for showing up and being diligent...