that's cool .....I think I did,and if you go back and revisit you will see that I always did.But,I beg your pardon ,again,moderator.When you say
You still don't understand ,
...,but that is not because you are dumb...no...no...I would not believe that ,ever.It is because I am not clear.I try though.You see....it is the child best interest that matters,for the Court.Therefore,how mom sees dad means nothing,for the Court to determine is there or not,danger from dad.If from presented evidence,Court determines there is danger,doesn't matter how mom sees dad,doesn't matter how she sow dad in the past,it doesn't matter if she changed her mind,it doesn't matter if she believes pigs can fly,it doesn't matter if she believes anything.If by presented evidence,
The Court believes the child is in danger doesn't matter all that.The Court will impose measures within its realm to protect the child.
That is why I said to ehm...the counselor, that the fact she knew who she was dealing before,but did nothing is irrelevant.Go see my first response,to the post of the GAL that called me idiot.It is just IRRELEVANT,what mattered or not to mom.So,why bring it?