HighwayMan
Super Secret Senior Member
No, I don't think. It does not matter what the vehicle is being used for.its not how the vehicle is deemed that matters, its how its used, U think? (used as equipment or enjoyed as personal goods)
It is not an arbitrary guess. It is obvious to see how the vehicle is equipped and it is an objective observation.your honor, its my understanding, the vehicle being deemed commercial or non-commercial was an arbitrary guess by the officer,
The officer had direct, first-hand knowledge of the vehicle.what facts stated by the plaintiff under oath with personal first hand knowledge on the court record prove the vehicle was not being used in commerce or as commercial equipment ?
And again, it does not matter what the vehicle is used for.
I don't understand how this "user" can continue to pollute this forum with total nonsense, wasting everyone's time and possibly misleading readers and nothing is done about it.