adjusterjack
Senior Member
This thread is getting patently ridiculous.
This thread is getting patently ridiculous.
Agreed.This thread is getting patently ridiculous.
OP owns the car and thus the TRADEMARK! Right? RIGHT? is that not how it works? RIGHT? Oh FFS! But Latigo wants to prove me wrong. Latigo and LDIJ should definitely marry. Then they could gang up on me as a married couple.Yes. I think latigo was so focused on your name, Ohiogal, that he totally missed that the poster is from Nebraska.
Although he cited inapplicable Ohio cases, I am impressed by the time he invested in research.
That said, I think both latigo and Person98 need to read more carefully. I still can't figure out how anyone could think a question about car ownership should be posted in the Patent section of the forum. It's not even close to a patent issue.
Hahaha.OP owns the car and thus the TRADEMARK! Right? RIGHT? is that not how it works? RIGHT? Oh FFS! But Latigo wants to prove me wrong. Latigo and LDIJ should definitely marry. Then they could gang up on me as a married couple.
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2720764/in-re-louise-v-steinhoefel-trust/15. Trusts: Proof. A party seeking to establish a constructive trust must prove by
clear and convincing evidence that the individual holding the property obtained
title to it by fraud, misrepresentation, or an abuse of an influential or confiden-
tial relationship and that under the circumstances, such individual should not,
according to the rules of equity and good conscience, hold and enjoy the property
so obtained.