FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
I am sure because i questioned the receptionist. The doctor wasn't in when i was there. I didn't pursue the issue because the relative didn't go for glaucoma treatment. The eye doctor never referred her to any other doctor for futher testing. I don't understand these "doctors."
Since you are a reasonable person, let me ask you this. You don't see a problem with the optometrist diagnosing her with glucoma without doing any other tests or referrring her to an opthalmologist for further testing?
No, nothing i said is false. So i don't worry about that. Truth trumps defamation.
That's what i said, if you don't know, you don't know. Don't troll me. It's not complicated.
You didn't read my post. Did not recoomend seeing ophthalmologist. Diagnosed her with glucoma. This is willful negligence. And i don't have a complaint?
What is the name of your state? NY.
This incident did not occur to me. It occurred to a relative of mine. So the story is true. This relative went to see an eye doctor to get a new pair of lenses. Did your regular eye exam with the refraction machine? That's it. Did not even test for eye...
I don't understand at all. I am not looking for help. I want to see what your opinion is. You can say it is not criminal. Or you can say it is criminal. But you have to provide a reason. That's all. It's not difficult.
I don't understand this at all. Maybe i am new to this forum. But if someone has a question, you offer your opinion, i can not disagree with it? I don't understand.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.