CourtClerk
Senior Member
And there is a remedy for this, at least in CA. The OP could easily file a claim of exemption if he found the amount fell out of guideline, or.... here's a thought, bring it up at the time of the order. One assumes that at the time of the order, the court has all of the information necessary to make an order that falls within the law. If circumstances change, then modify.A true IC payor, has no idea what their subcontractor's net income is. They have no idea what their subcontractor's payroll expenses and business expenses are. Therefore they could easily violate federal law by garnishing more than federal law allows.
However, as an employer or business owner in the State of CA, you'd have no choice or find yourself under civil penalty.As an accountant, and as a tax professional, and as someone who has been an employer or has been responsible for following federal law as CFO for a company, I am extremely uneasy about the idea of garnishing IC income.
Me too...As a taxpayer however, I am glad to see that IC income is also being garnished for CS.