married_tomoron
Junior Member
What is the name of your state? CA
Hi I filed for divorce in Aug. 2006, my stbx responded with an annulment based on fraud, 15 years married. No kids.
He has now dropped the annulment and asked for a Bifurcation of the dissolution. We still have not received any financial disclosures, which I know are supposed to be done before asking for the bifurcation. I know if he gets the dissolution separated from the financial stuff that it will cause the financial stuff to be dragged on forever.
He has moved out of state and has never showed for a court date. He has been hiding community funds, I have not had access to any of the business since the divorce started. We really don't have any assets other than a business which is primarily just cash flow. He has not done any paperwork without having the court order it done. He has no showed at depositions, ect. ect....
Is there anything that justifies good cause for why a bifurcation should not be granted?
I just feel that if the dissolution is separated from the other stuff, then he will postpone and delay the settlement part of the divorce, and I really really don't want to be in court for the next decade.
Other than the dissolution what incentive is there to reach an agreement on the other stuff?
Hi I filed for divorce in Aug. 2006, my stbx responded with an annulment based on fraud, 15 years married. No kids.
He has now dropped the annulment and asked for a Bifurcation of the dissolution. We still have not received any financial disclosures, which I know are supposed to be done before asking for the bifurcation. I know if he gets the dissolution separated from the financial stuff that it will cause the financial stuff to be dragged on forever.
He has moved out of state and has never showed for a court date. He has been hiding community funds, I have not had access to any of the business since the divorce started. We really don't have any assets other than a business which is primarily just cash flow. He has not done any paperwork without having the court order it done. He has no showed at depositions, ect. ect....
Is there anything that justifies good cause for why a bifurcation should not be granted?
I just feel that if the dissolution is separated from the other stuff, then he will postpone and delay the settlement part of the divorce, and I really really don't want to be in court for the next decade.
Other than the dissolution what incentive is there to reach an agreement on the other stuff?
Last edited: