txlandlady
Member
What is the name of your state? TX
I recently consulted an attorney regarding some tenants who were filing bankruptcy, wouldn't leave, etc. He gave me good advice, told me his fee up front, and luckily the tenant wound up leaving before we actually had to "do" anything.
I'm more than happy to pay this attorney for the advice he gave me (over the phone)as agreed, but now that I get his bill I'm questioning his seemingly agressive billing tactics. He's billing me for the preparation of a letter to these tenants, which was never delivered to them, because we discovered the moving truck in the driveway. Did he actually prepare the letter?........I doubt it. He kind of drug his feet on it for 2 days (when it actually might have helped me get some of the $$ they owed me.) If he did actually prepare it, shouldn't he have sent me a copy of it?
Then he's billing me for correspondence. The "correspondence" is basically a summary of the phone converstaion we had the previous day. Useless. We verbally summarized our conversation before getting off the phone. I didn't ask for it, and I don't need/want it. Is this standard practice? I've NEVER had an attorney do such a thing. Plus, he's billing .25 hours for it, and a 2nd grader could have written it in 2 minutes.
I have NO PROBLEM paying him for his time. It just really seems like he's trying VERY hard to squeeze every minute he can into his billing. I liked his advice, and wouldn't mind continuing to use him. It's very hard to find attorneys who are well versed in landlord/tenant law beyond the very basics. If I write him a polite but firm letter will that straighten him out?
My cell phone bill is downloading as I type this so I can actually compare the length of our converstations to what he's billing me for. Some of the times on those seem rather exaggerated, too.
What does this sound like to ya'll, and how do I proceed?
Thanks in advance,
Karla in Amarillo
I recently consulted an attorney regarding some tenants who were filing bankruptcy, wouldn't leave, etc. He gave me good advice, told me his fee up front, and luckily the tenant wound up leaving before we actually had to "do" anything.
I'm more than happy to pay this attorney for the advice he gave me (over the phone)as agreed, but now that I get his bill I'm questioning his seemingly agressive billing tactics. He's billing me for the preparation of a letter to these tenants, which was never delivered to them, because we discovered the moving truck in the driveway. Did he actually prepare the letter?........I doubt it. He kind of drug his feet on it for 2 days (when it actually might have helped me get some of the $$ they owed me.) If he did actually prepare it, shouldn't he have sent me a copy of it?
Then he's billing me for correspondence. The "correspondence" is basically a summary of the phone converstaion we had the previous day. Useless. We verbally summarized our conversation before getting off the phone. I didn't ask for it, and I don't need/want it. Is this standard practice? I've NEVER had an attorney do such a thing. Plus, he's billing .25 hours for it, and a 2nd grader could have written it in 2 minutes.
I have NO PROBLEM paying him for his time. It just really seems like he's trying VERY hard to squeeze every minute he can into his billing. I liked his advice, and wouldn't mind continuing to use him. It's very hard to find attorneys who are well versed in landlord/tenant law beyond the very basics. If I write him a polite but firm letter will that straighten him out?
My cell phone bill is downloading as I type this so I can actually compare the length of our converstations to what he's billing me for. Some of the times on those seem rather exaggerated, too.
What does this sound like to ya'll, and how do I proceed?
Thanks in advance,
Karla in Amarillo
Last edited: