gamom34t said:
No I'm not expecting any kind of windfall. As a matter of fact I will be surprised if he ever pays. And you're right, I blame myself too but that doesn't make him exempt from responsibility. This is the THIRD time he's been filed against. Point being, my child is not doing without nor will she ever. He has to live with himself when he realizes what he's missed. I am not as bitter or hateful as some of the people who post here. I was looking for answers that were closer to the truth instead of a bunch of opinions. Thanks though.
If you're not expecting some kind of windfall, why are you looking for seven years of back support? Sounds like a windfall to me. And get it through your head, he is not responsible to pay you until a judge orders him to pay. That is the legal answer to this. If you never file, and if he is never ordered, he never has to pay.
I gave you the truth when I posted the link to general information about all states including LA and GA. If you actually clicked on the link and read it, you'd know that all of us have been telling you the legal truth about your situation. You simply can't handle the truth, because once again, you want the windfall of seven years of back support. You don't like that neither state offers you that windfall, and instead of taking responsibility for your own inaction, you keep hoping someone here will magically change the laws of both of those states so you can get what you want.
So now you've filed, and he will very likely be ordered to start paying from the date the petition was filed. Why not look at the glass as being half full with that knowledge instead of half empty with the knowledge that there will be no windfall? Your child will get the support he/she deserves once the judge orders it. Better than nothing, don't you think?