M
mayorsmith
Guest
i'm still in ca. !! from the data that others have reported, there seems to be only 2 cases listed at the ca. law library of someone charged with a violation of penal code 591, injuring or damaging a utility line. that seems pretty amazing. does anyone have a perspective on what a counties district attorney's office's true agenda is, when it comes to deciding which cases to file charges on ? i mean when the law responds to a domestic disturbance call, and they find that it is merely an incident of verbal domestic disturbance, and that no one is injured, or abused, and that is what their report states; why would an assistant district attorney decide to file charges on the incident ? if this decision was based on a statement in the sherriff's report which claims on of the parties involved admitted to a violation of #591, when in fact the individual was not even questioned about it, or even interviewed by the deputy that wrote the report, somebody is going to get up ther and commit perjury!! and it won't be me!!