• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Can Property Owned by IRA Trust be Forced to Sell?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

enricosuave263

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? CALIF

A broker set up a $50k Note for which I was willing to put up a property in my own name as collateral for. So far, all business as usual. However, just before close of escrow, the Lender (private individual) wanted more collateral and wanted the deed to my other property added to the Note as well. So this was done to complete the loan for the $50k.

Here's the thing. That 2nd property is owned by my IRA Real Estate Trust account, not by me personally though the account is to "my benefit". Essentially, this property is simply an investment owned by my retirement trust.

If I were to default, I understand that the first property (owned in my personal name) can be sold to pay the debt. But I'm being told that if there is not enough equity in that property.., my 2nd property (owned by the IRA Trust) could also be forced into sale for collections.

Is this true? I had thought IRA/Retirement money is not available until I reach age 65. (I am 45 right now) Also, wouldn't that count as a pre-retirement 'benefit' if it was sold to pay off a pre-retirement obligation?

What it comes down to is.. is my IRA-owned property safe from a forced sale in the case of default if it's listed in the Note? :confused:
 
Last edited:


TigerD

Senior Member
And to add insult to injury, you may be liable for taxes and penalties for the early withdrawl of funds from the IRA. -- You should probably talk to your accountant as well as your lawyer.

DC
 

tranquility

Senior Member
I'd have to read in more detail and look at the actual transaction, but the IRA may already have been considered distributed and you owe the income tax on the amount and the penalty *now*. You can't use IRA property for a loan benefical to yourself per the regulations. You best get yourself to a good CPA or tax attorney right now to review the transaction. If you have distributed the IRA, if you don't pay the tax and penalties now, you will get creamed in the future with the additional excise tax and other penalties.
 
Last edited:

anteater

Senior Member
I'd have to read in more detail and look at the actual transaction, but the IRA may already have been considered distributed and you owe the income tax on the amount and the penalty *now*. You can't use IRA property for a loan benefical to yourself per the regulations. You best get yourself to a good CPA or tax attorney right now to review the transaction. If you have distributed the IRA, if you don't pay the tax and penalties now, you will get creamed in the future with the additional excise tax and other penalties.
I believe that you are correct, tranquility. One of the landmines of stuffing real estate into an IRA.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top