To be honest with you, I've never looked at this so far as me wanting to gain primary custody. My concern is to be able to get a better parenting plan where I can see him more often. Due to that decreasing and not getting proper recommendations or answers to why, where I see better parenting plans online for children his age, made me feel the way I do. My understanding is, along with age, time sharing for the other parent increases. Questions I ask I don't get responses to, false allegations which I hear for the first time such as him coming back mean during exchanges, which have previously never been discussed or brought to anyone's attention, get put in to the motion. If I was the judge, with the allegations written, I'd also think that the Dad was doing something wrong at first glance.What you're not understanding is that it's not the GAL's job to be impartial. It's the GAL's job to attempt to determine what's in the best interests of the child. And ultimately, that means choosing which parent is most likely to see to the child's best interests and foster a relationship with the other parent.
"Siding" with Mom isn't unethical bias, it's seeing that Mom is doing something right. You're not going to get hte GAL removed, or her recommendations thrown out because it seems like she "favors" Mom. And, before you start in on "Of course, because the Courts hate men"... the reverse is also true.
You're trying to gain primary custody, regardless of how you phrase it. And that's a HUGE burden.
I would greatly appreciate it if I could be assisted on how to speak to the judge to defend myself and what the GAL has written when she filed this motion.