milspecgirl
Senior Member
fact is that both parents had legal rights to the child. she could have taken him and run just as he did. the key to proving "kidnapping" (which it's not) would be copied of missing persons reports, etc. HARD PROOF that she had every resource notified of her son's disappearance. The IRS, FBI, etc would have been on alert for any SS numbers used, names, etc.
Chances are, she didn't have the resources to fight and just let it go.
She was notified of CS years ago. A person whose child had truely been taken (at least in the eyes of the judge) would have immediately notified all those same ppl (FBI, etc) that she now had info to track them down.
Plus, he would have had to have proof of custody in order to enroll the child in school, and even get a CS order.
I think she was the missing person in this case
Chances are, she didn't have the resources to fight and just let it go.
She was notified of CS years ago. A person whose child had truely been taken (at least in the eyes of the judge) would have immediately notified all those same ppl (FBI, etc) that she now had info to track them down.
Plus, he would have had to have proof of custody in order to enroll the child in school, and even get a CS order.
I think she was the missing person in this case