Thanks, I-Got-Banned, for your answers....
I understand the concept that it is too late for me to be asking any new questions or to modify any questions that I asked to fit the "key teeth" that would have unlocked the door of consideration. I see that it probably wasn't merely enough to have "key questions" if I didn't ask them properly.
I personally felt that the prosecution presented nothing outside of the officer's testimony and, in fact, were not even present (no prosecutor) to question my exhibits.
The appearance to me was that the prosecution was not held to a standard of presentation and questioning that I was held to.... Heck, there wasn't even a prosecutor present!
I believe I asked the right key questions to cast "reasonable doubt" on the officer's testimony and documents, and that a Judge, in his impartial administration of the proceedings, should have granted my requests for dismissal rather than (perhaps) secretly requiring me to first ask to have these individual items of evidence excluded, even though every one of these pieces were necessary chain links for admission of radar evidence.
In totality, I successfully created enough "reasonable doubt" regarding the officer's recollection and credibility, and documentation that, if the scales of justice were not weighted in favor of the prosecution, I would have been fairly and impartially acquitted.
I understand the concept that it is too late for me to be asking any new questions or to modify any questions that I asked to fit the "key teeth" that would have unlocked the door of consideration. I see that it probably wasn't merely enough to have "key questions" if I didn't ask them properly.
I personally felt that the prosecution presented nothing outside of the officer's testimony and, in fact, were not even present (no prosecutor) to question my exhibits.
The appearance to me was that the prosecution was not held to a standard of presentation and questioning that I was held to.... Heck, there wasn't even a prosecutor present!
I believe I asked the right key questions to cast "reasonable doubt" on the officer's testimony and documents, and that a Judge, in his impartial administration of the proceedings, should have granted my requests for dismissal rather than (perhaps) secretly requiring me to first ask to have these individual items of evidence excluded, even though every one of these pieces were necessary chain links for admission of radar evidence.
In totality, I successfully created enough "reasonable doubt" regarding the officer's recollection and credibility, and documentation that, if the scales of justice were not weighted in favor of the prosecution, I would have been fairly and impartially acquitted.
Last edited:
