Don't mean to be a douche, but before all you arrogant people decide to automatically start trying to bully people around and jump to conclusions as soon as someone asks a question, don't you read first to understand the question?
I don't mind the $100 for the arrears that I've been paying, what I DO mind is having my "baby momma" get my tax refund deposited to her account when the judge ordered the opposite and the DES office decided to over look that piece of information in the order when the case waa transferred over to them.
FYI, funny thing but yesterday I checked the mail and there it was, a letter from our lovely state of Arizona informing me that I am past due on my arrears and that I have 30 days to appeal it. Funny how things work out sometimes.
But seriously people, they are some less fortunate than me that come to this website hoping they will get some answers without having to automatically be cyber bullied or judged as soon as the thread is posted.
lets have some humility and improve on our interpersonal skills.
EMPATHY, EMPATHY, EMPATHY.
Did you even read my post?
Up until a year ago, I worked in child support. My job? Encouraging folks to become/remain compliant with their orders.
A letter does go out informing people that they do have a right to appeal. The legitimate grounds for appeal include:
Mistake of Fact--you do not owe what is claimed.
Mistake of Person: You are not the obligor in question.
There are a few others, but they do not apply in this situation.
If you read my post, you should have responded then, so I'll ask very specifically.
When the judge ordered you to makes the $100/month payment on the arrears, did the order specifically state that you were making these payments to avoid specific enforcement remedies INCLUDING tax intercept?
If your order does not state that, then tax intercept is still on the table and the intercept was legal and legit. Your "baby momma" is only getting part of what you owe her.