If you're going to backpedal so fast, you really need a rear view mirror.
You stated that $10 K per month for a year would be OK with the IRS. Their recapture rules say it would not be. It's right there in black and white.
I guess it's possible that if Bill Gates were getting a divorce, that the IRS wouldn't consider $120 K to be significant, but for the real world, the recapture rules would apply.
Just admit it - you were wrong.
I am not backpedaling...I am talking proportionality and purpose...and I am not wrong.
Ok..lets put it this way. OH (for example) allows for short term alimony for a short term marriage. So lets say that a judge orders someone to pay alimony for two years only and they are ordered to pay 2000.00 a month. That is 24k per year and clearly more than 15k.
The way that you are explaining the article you read means that someone who is only ordered to pay alimony for one or two years would have to recapture that alimony...or if someones ex passed away or remarried they would have to recapture the alimony if its more than 15k per year. That is not how the recapture rules work.
Now, I will give you an example of how they DO work.
There is no upfront settlement, and someone is going to pay long term alimony. For the first year or two they pay 5k a month and in the third year it drops to 1k, and remains at 1k permanently. Or, there is a clearly lopsided up front settlement, and the same scenario applies.
That is clearly a case of a property settlement being structured as alimony, and that is what the recapture rules are designed to stop.
That is why alimony must be consistant over the term of the alimony. Someone can pay short term alimony that is over 15k per year without running afoul of the recapture rules.