tranquility
Senior Member
Exactly. If the money was all in joint accounts there is nothing for the will to distribute. It's not a trump, it's a different game.Also, if joint ownership trumps the will then what's the point.
Exactly. If the money was all in joint accounts there is nothing for the will to distribute. It's not a trump, it's a different game.Also, if joint ownership trumps the will then what's the point.
It was never your money (or your mom's apparently) to begin with. Personally, I find it morally offensive that people assume they have a "moral" right to ANYTHING that's not theirs.It comes down to being morally right or legally right. It is unfortunate that more people can not be both.
Sorry you are morally offended by my quest for my Aunt's true wishes. I was under the impression a will was prepared to make a persons wishes known.It was never your money (or your mom's apparently) to begin with. Personally, I find it morally offensive that people assume they have a "moral" right to ANYTHING that's not theirs.
But when your aunt put it in accounts with joint ownership, she was making her wishes known. Her wishes were that the joint owners get the money after she dies. Her wishes were obviously that you get nothing.Sorry you are morally offended by my quest for my Aunt's true wishes. I was under the impression a will was prepared to make a persons wishes known.
Your questions are moot since all this happened long ago; nothing can be done about it now.I would like to thank those that provided meaningful feedback to this thread.
Unfortunatly it appears there is no moderation here so brainless trolls are are allowed to roam freely. That is to bad.
It may be moot from a legal standpoint but lets review a few things I said in this thread:Your questions are moot since all this happened long ago; nothing can be done about it now.
I talked to my living aunt and she said there was no POA. It was all done through joint ownership of the accounts. In one case my uncle the executor used his power of joint ownership to remove my aunt from joint ownership of property and accounts without her knowledge. Then he was able to keep all the money for himself. According to the parasite trolls on this site the deceased wanted my uncle to have all the money since his name was the only on on the account.Was your aunt suffering from a disease or taking medication that would have affected her mental capacity and subject her to possible undue influence from the uncle? If you were able to find out whether the uncle obtained power of attorney to handle her affairs, you might be able to make a case for abuse of power of attorney if you could uncover evidence of that through how the assets were handled.
Not true. That is certainly a fact or circumstance which a person can try to get a court to declare another incompetent, but is hardly determinative and would have no effect on a will until a court declares the now-deceased person incompetent. I think the odds of this happening for a death which happened six years ago is....zero.If it's possible that her medical records show she was diagnosed with Alzheimer's during the same time that she signed the will, the will is going to be invalid anyhow.
But I am highly skeptical that your living aunt is relating this accurately. Any financial institution that would "remove" a joint owner without that owner's consent or proof that the joint owner is deceased is potentially in deep doo-doo.It was all done through joint ownership of the accounts. In one case my uncle the executor used his power of joint ownership to remove my aunt from joint ownership of property and accounts without her knowledge.
Remember that my living aunt is on my side. The exact quote is:Just for the record, since the OP says that he/she does not intend to take any action...
I don't doubt that your living aunt told this to you:
"It was all done through joint ownership of the accounts. In one case my uncle the executor used his power of joint ownership to remove my aunt from joint ownership of property and accounts without her knowledge."
But I am highly skeptical that your living aunt is relating this accurately. Any financial institution that would "remove" a joint owner without that owner's consent or proof that the joint owner is deceased is potentially in deep doo-doo.
Agreed - and what I was pointing out. But I hope that you are not interpreting that to mean that the deceased joint owner's name cannot be removed from the account.I just got off the phone with the bank and they told me that one joint owner can NOT remove another joint owner from an account, before or after death.
Wow MDconnor we seem to be in the same boat. I feel exactly like you and I am trying to get a copy of the will and findout how this crap went down also. I feel like if they had nothing to hide why wont they show us?It seems money was taken by ownership and not inheritance. That is why I want to read the will so I will not have to assume. It is important to me to know who is friend and who is foe.