• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

do i have grounds for legal/civil recourse?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Just Blue

Senior Member
sc2247 said:
i was convicted of downloading images of girls 1-3 years younger then me when i was 19. if you really think that makes me scum, then so be it.

Some day...god help them...you will have children...IF you have a daughter...How would you feel about pervs downloading images of her...huh?...I have a 16 yo....I would KILL...and I do mean KILL...Think about it...Maybe you might understand why you are reviled.
 


sc2247

Junior Member
baystategirl said:
Some day...god help them...you will have children...IF you have a daughter...How would you feel about pervs downloading images of her...huh?...I have a 16 yo....I would KILL...and I do mean KILL...Think about it...Maybe you might understand why you are reviled.
so you think i was a pervert for being interested in girls 3 years younger then me?
 

Just Blue

Senior Member
sc2247 said:
so you think i was a pervert for being interested in girls 3 years younger then me?

I think you are a pervert for contributing to underage girls being sexually exploited....You do understand that most of the girls on those sites are being controlled in some way...don't you?

And what the heck do you care what I think?
 

weenor

Senior Member
sc2247 said:
so you think i was a pervert for being interested in girls 3 years younger then me?

You were not convicted for your "interest" in younger girls, you were convicted for your conduct in downloading sexually explicit pictures of minors.
 

garrula lingua

Senior Member
Bullcrap, pervert.

Most Prosecutors won't file on 'girls a few years younger than me'

Prosecutors have to prove that the victims are underage. Most won't file unless they have an expert available to testify to bone structure and development to prove the victims age.

Most of these cases involve victims less then 10 years old --it is easier to prove that a 10 year old is under 18; very difficult to prove a 16 yr old is less that 18.

You are a pervert. Your victims were children, not older teens -- very few jurisdictions file on older teens.

EVERY PERVERT convicted of child porn claims he was 19 and she was 17.
BULLCRAP -- those cases don't get filed. Your victim was a CHILD.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top