I edited :Dad gifted the money to daughter who bought property for herself.
If you don't wanna help anything but your own curiosity, it's fine.What happened to the boyfriend? Is he feeble or responsible? Just curious.
The property should have been put in all of their names.I edited :
2. Daughter knows a good realtor, so Dad gives $160k to Daughter to buy a condo FOR THE 3 CHILDREN (under her name)
Consult with a RE attorney in your area.No, it doesn't matter.
I'm not asking you to speculate on who you believe is objective or not.
But to read a situation as already stated objectively, and draw conclusions off it.
May I be any of these characters, it won't change what you can make of the situation one single bit.
It's only is relevant if this is a professional diagnosis, and Daughter has been declared the legal guardian of her disabled relatives. Has she been granted a POA to handle her disabled relatives' assets?Important part of the story is:
. Dad has EXTREME oblivious irresponsible immature mentality (like mentally 16yo)
. Son 1 has PRONOUNCED oblivious irresponsible immature mentality (like mentally 19yo)
. and Daughter is more of a responsible go-getter.
Any real property should have been placed in the names of all three children. The deed only listed Daughter apparently as the owner. Hence it is HER property.I edited :
2. Daughter knows a good realtor, so Dad gives $160k to Daughter to buy a condo FOR THE 3 CHILDREN (under her name)
You don't seem objective.I don't think it matters in order to have an objective view of the situation for you.
That's only important for people who reads that to understand how can 2 people be so unconscious and oblivious for years of what's happening around them. If I didn't mention that, nobody could understand that part.No, that's not important at all. It's irrelevant.
Please explain what you mean by it, and what solution you propose.Your description of the parties involved is not exactly “objective.”
What is that?There may be an exception to the statute of frauds. There may be a constructive trust.
What area though? Florida or NC?Consult with a RE attorney in your area.
"Feeble-minded" LOL."Nice" daughter, though - taking advantage of her "feeble-minded" family. <spit>
It's irrelevant because nobody, especially not a lawyer, would have to understand that to provide a legal analysis of the arrangement.That's only important for people who reads that to understand how can 2 people be so unconscious and oblivious for years of what's happening around them. If I didn't mention that, nobody could understand that part.
Probably where the property and the daughter are located.What area though? Florida or NC?
So, they are not incompetent from a legal standpoint. It sounds like your initial description is based on your opinion, not a professional diagnosis.That's only important for people who reads that to understand how can 2 people be so unconscious and oblivious for years of what's happening around them. If I didn't mention that, nobody could understand that part.
Statute of frauds:What is that?