tjr5150 said:
My injury was to my ankle, tibula, 6 screws a cadavers bone put in to replace most of tibula rebroke heel to restraighten it.. and a road map of scars around my ankle,foot,and calf..lol.. back on subject, i'm not sure why the doctor had the pt do the test, is this something i should confront him on or bring to attention to him?
tjr5150,
Your doctor sending you to the pt for the testing is fine. The pt doing the testing per doctor's orders is fine. The pt sending the results, including further recommendations, to the doctor is fine. The doctor evaluating the testing and writing the report for your records and case is what is important. Just because your doctor sent you to the pt for the testing does not mean that the testing results are not valid - it's just what YOUR doctor does, not any of mine. Problems that occured with treatment were discussed with my attorney. If you are not having problems with your treatment, then you are in "good hands" with your doctor.
You are in litigation. Think about it this way, what report holds more weight when the time comes for a settlement: a report from a medical doctor or a report from a health care professional that is not a medical doctor. If you have any doubts about this, ask your attorney. Just wait for the report to be done by the doctor and get yourself a copy. You do have an attorney, correct?
I don't know about CO, here the impairment evaluation MUST be done by an M.D.