P
PJSinWI
Guest
I live in Wisconsin and was recently on the receiving end of a rear-end auto accident. There was susbstantial damage to my car. The other party admitted it was his fault. I am sore and stiff but nothing seems seriously wrong, though I haven't seen a doctor yet. I was in another rear-end accident about 15 years ago and know from experience that neck and back pain can last for quite a few years. I did not pursue legal action in that accident. I am seriously considering hiring a lawyer for this accident. I am just curious as to how this is going to all play out. My questions are:
1. Would it be better to see a doctor that my lawyer suggests or someone from the clinic that I get my health care from? (My family doctor is on medical leave so I would need to see someone new.)
2. If nothing is physically serious with me, does it pay to pursue it? Are allowances made for "future" pain and discomfort?
3. I almost feel guilty for pursuing legal action, but I am "pissed" that this has inconvenieced me and that I am sure I am going to have problems with discomfort in my neck as this accident was more severe than the one 15 years ago.
4. What's the general thinking of lawyers among cases like this (not terribly serious)?
I appreciate your time and expertise.
Thank you.
Peter
1. Would it be better to see a doctor that my lawyer suggests or someone from the clinic that I get my health care from? (My family doctor is on medical leave so I would need to see someone new.)
2. If nothing is physically serious with me, does it pay to pursue it? Are allowances made for "future" pain and discomfort?
3. I almost feel guilty for pursuing legal action, but I am "pissed" that this has inconvenieced me and that I am sure I am going to have problems with discomfort in my neck as this accident was more severe than the one 15 years ago.
4. What's the general thinking of lawyers among cases like this (not terribly serious)?
I appreciate your time and expertise.
Thank you.
Peter