What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Illinois (but likely happening in all 50 states)
As many schools have done since Sandy Hook, our schools just added a new security system. Each and every time a parent comes to the school and needs/wants to enter, they must surrender their state id/license and a background check is run before they are issued a temporary photo id that allows them access to the building.
As an advocate for parents of students with special needs, I work with many families and I know that not all of them will want to submit to a background check (either because they believe in privacy or because there is something in their past that they do not want to be common knowledge). Clearly, they have a legal right to be an equal member of their child's IEP team.
Logically, it seems that forcing a parent to undergo a background check prior to being allowed to participate in the IEP meeting would violate several basic rights. If a parent refuses to submit to a background check in order to attend their child's IEP meeting, the obvious solution would be to either escort the parent directly to and from the meeting room, ensuring that they have no unsupevised access to the building or to place the security doors such that one meeting room is outside of security.
Is there a law or legal precedent that I could show the school? My goal is to have the school establish a procedure for allowing parents to participate in the IEP without the background check, while meeting the desire of the school to create the illusion of safety.
As many schools have done since Sandy Hook, our schools just added a new security system. Each and every time a parent comes to the school and needs/wants to enter, they must surrender their state id/license and a background check is run before they are issued a temporary photo id that allows them access to the building.
As an advocate for parents of students with special needs, I work with many families and I know that not all of them will want to submit to a background check (either because they believe in privacy or because there is something in their past that they do not want to be common knowledge). Clearly, they have a legal right to be an equal member of their child's IEP team.
Logically, it seems that forcing a parent to undergo a background check prior to being allowed to participate in the IEP meeting would violate several basic rights. If a parent refuses to submit to a background check in order to attend their child's IEP meeting, the obvious solution would be to either escort the parent directly to and from the meeting room, ensuring that they have no unsupevised access to the building or to place the security doors such that one meeting room is outside of security.
Is there a law or legal precedent that I could show the school? My goal is to have the school establish a procedure for allowing parents to participate in the IEP without the background check, while meeting the desire of the school to create the illusion of safety.