CJane
Senior Member
Informing the court that a move was possible would have assisted the court (and therefore you and your ex) with TIMING. There COULD have been a clause included that stated "In the event that NCP must relocate prior to XX/XX/XXXX, child shall spend June with NCP. In the event that NCP either does not relocate, or relocates after XX/XX/XXXX, the SOP for summer visitation applies."I am not understanding. If I would have known about the move what would that have changed about the visitation order? Not the actual schedule, right?
In a case such as this, where you KNEW there was a likelihood that you'd need to move prior to July, and yet you went along with the order as if there was going to be no change in anything means (IMO) that you need to comply with the order as if you were going to be living close to Mom. Which means you need to finance kiddo's travel to HI for the month of July.My concern is the short notice of the move and the short notice notification to the CP. Is there a rule/law/requirement that applies in a short notice situation such as this? Does the 100 mile or more visitation schedule apply to this summer, given the short notice?
OR you need to get Mom to agree to alternate arrangements, but she is under no obligation whatsoever to accommodate you.
And YOU should be responsible for ALL travel expenses.
I think your attorney gave you exceedingly poor advice.We did have hints of a move but had no idea when or if it would happen. Our attorney at the time advised us to keep the possibility of move to ourselves. He said it would only prolong and confuse the situation.