signspinner
Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? wisconsin
So I went to a hearing that i had been sent correspondence for that it was a status conference. I had requested a de novo hearing previously. Went i was in said hearing the judge swore the petitioner in and began taking testimony. Then the judge swore me in and started asking questions pertaining to the de novo hearing. I said
"your honor the correspondence I recieved said this was a staus conference and so I did little to prepare as far as I have tons of documented evidence, I have not recieved the transcripts from the last hearing and my witness's are not present, i believed because of the correspondence this was a status conference" he said "why i am not a lawyer" and continued asking questions. needless to say i was thumped and they held the denovo hearing under the guise of a staus conference thus screwing me, because i had no evidence filed nor witness's present, once again because the only notification i got was for a status conference. If I send the judge the copy of the letter of status conference could i possibly get yet another hearing? was this even truly a legally binding hearing when they send the wrong correspondence?
Or now do i gotta go to the appelate court with all the fancy color cordinated briefs? Is improper notification grounds for a re hearing?
So I went to a hearing that i had been sent correspondence for that it was a status conference. I had requested a de novo hearing previously. Went i was in said hearing the judge swore the petitioner in and began taking testimony. Then the judge swore me in and started asking questions pertaining to the de novo hearing. I said
"your honor the correspondence I recieved said this was a staus conference and so I did little to prepare as far as I have tons of documented evidence, I have not recieved the transcripts from the last hearing and my witness's are not present, i believed because of the correspondence this was a status conference" he said "why i am not a lawyer" and continued asking questions. needless to say i was thumped and they held the denovo hearing under the guise of a staus conference thus screwing me, because i had no evidence filed nor witness's present, once again because the only notification i got was for a status conference. If I send the judge the copy of the letter of status conference could i possibly get yet another hearing? was this even truly a legally binding hearing when they send the wrong correspondence?
Or now do i gotta go to the appelate court with all the fancy color cordinated briefs? Is improper notification grounds for a re hearing?