Oh, Christ, here we go into another battle of your semantics.... and attempts to bend the facts to support your erroneous post.....
And even then, the referenced information (and you repeated it), simply contradicts your own post, that "there is no provision to determine fault". Didn't you read it??
It CLEARLY says:
"Missouri courts have said that if animals stray onto a highway and are involved in an accident, the law presumes negligence on the part of the owner of the animals.
To avoid liability in such a situation, the owner must prove that he or she was not negligent or that the driver of the motor vehicle was himself negligent, and that this negligence on the part of the driver was a contributing cause of the accident.""
The fact is, livestock and horses wander the highways quite often, as my brother found out when he hit a horse in North Texas while driving south on I-75, back about 1970 or so. The horses head came through the windshield, while the rest of his body went down the drivers side of the car. And yes, it was at night, and yes, it was just over the top of a hill. And no owner even dared step forward and lay claim to the animal (or what was left of him).
Yes, I did. Did you??? Obviously not, as it clearly discussed the relevant issue and possible liabilities.rmet4nzkx said:Then you didn't go and actually read what was on the site?
Fault or the determination of it was NEVER a part of this thread. Again, it is just another of your 'imaginary' what if scenarios..... 'what if the OP meant to ask about determining fault?'.If you did you would see that there is provision to determine fault, in this case OP fails to explain anything he did to avoid the situation or anything that prevented him from avoiding it or any specific reason the owner of the cow was negligent.
And even then, the referenced information (and you repeated it), simply contradicts your own post, that "there is no provision to determine fault". Didn't you read it??
It CLEARLY says:
"Missouri courts have said that if animals stray onto a highway and are involved in an accident, the law presumes negligence on the part of the owner of the animals.
To avoid liability in such a situation, the owner must prove that he or she was not negligent or that the driver of the motor vehicle was himself negligent, and that this negligence on the part of the driver was a contributing cause of the accident.""
The fact is, livestock and horses wander the highways quite often, as my brother found out when he hit a horse in North Texas while driving south on I-75, back about 1970 or so. The horses head came through the windshield, while the rest of his body went down the drivers side of the car. And yes, it was at night, and yes, it was just over the top of a hill. And no owner even dared step forward and lay claim to the animal (or what was left of him).