seniorjudge
Senior Member
It really was just the principle of the whole thing.
The principle of the whole thing is that merchants have the right to do this.
The principle of the whole thing is that merchants have the right to do this.
don't get me started, but in a nut shell:CdwJava said:I have to ask ... why not?
- Carl
This is a legal forum Take your OPINION POLL elsewhere.gawm said:don't get me started, but in a nut shell:
a customer's standpoint; stores are always filthy, at least the ones in Arizona are.
WORST customer service by far( i don't know if it's because they get paid so little or if they get paid so little because of their customer service)
NOT ALWAYS the lowest price
then from a union members standpoint, i get a lot of information on how badly there workers really do get short changed. a billion dollar company, and a lot of their full time workers are on gov. assistance. not to mention how their unfair labor practices affect other businesses
Walmart will be a big part of the reason why china will own this country in a couple of decades
but this is just my opinion, please feel free to shop where ever you please, just remember the high cost of low prices
Sure it is. Probable cause does not require absolute certainty. And unless these things were going off all the time either due to malfunction or employee error, it's good cause.Two Bit said:As frequently as those things result in false alarms, what level of proof do they have if you walk out and the alarm goes off. It certainly isn't probable cause. If they did force a search, any evidence gained would be admissible since it wasn't conducted by a state agent.
I think it depends on the state and on store policy. As far as I can tell, CA state law does not grant any special exemption or power to detain to private citizens, and I have yet to see any published decisive case law on the detention issue for CA.As citizens, they have the power of arrest, but I'm nto sure that it grants them authority to detain. I figure the power to ban you from the proerpty and make an arrest.
But, if they did have cause? Out here, the alarm would be sufficient probable cause for a C/A or at least a detention.If they did use any force to detain or search without probable cause, I could see filing criminal charges against the store employee.
Not the ones here. I used to work in a city that now has THREE of the things. My current city has one.gawm said:a customer's standpoint; stores are always filthy, at least the ones in Arizona are.
And that is different from other businesses ... how? Mine gives great service ... well, as good as they can. There are few knowledgeable people in the key technical areas (electronics, hardware, etc.) but then, I go there for the price not the service. If I want service there are better local providers. But, for price, I can't beat it unless I drive 35 miles.WORST customer service by far( i don't know if it's because they get paid so little or if they get paid so little because of their customer service)
NOT ALWAYS the lowest price
Nobody is forced to work there. And, depending on the economy, what they pay may be the prevailing wage. Where I live and work Wal-Mart's wages are good wages. The employees here like working there.then from a union members standpoint, i get a lot of information on how badly there workers really do get short changed.
Which "unfair practices" would those be that effect other businesses?not to mention how their unfair labor practices affect other businesses
I know the high cost of high prices ... Top Ramen at the end of the pay period!but this is just my opinion, please feel free to shop where ever you please, just remember the high cost of low prices
I see you own some walmart stock Good for you I was asked a question and I answered it. You don't agree with it, that's fineBelizeBreeze said:This is a legal forum Take your OPINION POLL elsewhere.
I guess the last e-mail you got from Mary didn't make an impression. We'll see what the next one does for you.gawm said:I see you own some walmart stock Good for you I was asked a question and I answered it. You don't agree with it, that's fine
NEWS FLASH: all of your OPINIONS are not of a legal nature!
I'll make you a deal, you leave your OPINIONS out of post and I'll leave mine out
what's wrong? Did scruffy go in your bran flakes instead of the litter box again?BelizeBreeze said:I guess the last e-mail you got from Mary didn't make an impression. We'll see what the next one does for you.
lol lol lol** Oops, my dog just threw up, gotta go! But, personally I love the Super Wal-Marts.gawm said:what's wrong? Did scruffy go in your bran flakes instead of the litter box again?
Yes I acknowledge that. Like I said I accept the rfid detector was probably enough for them to be suspect but as a personal and not legal thing I still feel like it is an injustice. Besides I really felt like being a pain in the butt that night anyway.CdwJava said:And they coul dhave lawfully detained you and called the police. Or, detained you long enough to determine if you did indeed commit the theft. The law does not require them to be correct or perfect, only that there is sufficient probable cause to believe a crime had been committed and that you had committed the crime. Had they detained you, it would have been lawful and you would have had no cause of action.
- Carl
You can always choose to shop elsewhere.justalayman said:Yes I acknowledge that. Like I said I accept the rfid detector was probably enough for them to be suspect but as a personal and not legal thing I still feel like it is an injustice. Besides I really felt like being a pain in the butt that night anyway.
Thats pretty much the way I've heard it.gawm said:the loss prevention personal where i work once told me that if a customer did not want to show a receipt there was nothing they can do about it unless they actually saw them steal something. this is in AZ