i am not interested in playing lawyerese games with you. i did not supply false information, but rather helpful. instead of saying "could not", it would have been totally accurate if i had said "highly, highly improbable".
since you have nothing to back up your point of view, you want me to provide all the detail, so that you can nitpick on a statement, instead of actually trying to help the op. typical lawyer ploy when he has no real argument. try to confuse the issue.
believe me, i know how lawyers are.
i gave the op solid info. get your signatures notarized, whenever possible. it cant hurt, and may very well help.
i will tell the op that a notary is something that the law has set up to verify signatures. a witness is not. and i will let him use his own head to make a decision about what sort of signature is preferable.
enough said. i have no desire to dig your hole any deeper, as you are having trouble climbing out of it, as it is.
since you have nothing to back up your point of view, you want me to provide all the detail, so that you can nitpick on a statement, instead of actually trying to help the op. typical lawyer ploy when he has no real argument. try to confuse the issue.
believe me, i know how lawyers are.
i gave the op solid info. get your signatures notarized, whenever possible. it cant hurt, and may very well help.
i will tell the op that a notary is something that the law has set up to verify signatures. a witness is not. and i will let him use his own head to make a decision about what sort of signature is preferable.
enough said. i have no desire to dig your hole any deeper, as you are having trouble climbing out of it, as it is.