fairisfair
Senior Member
Define relevant.Farisfair, if you don't have anything relevant to add, please don't troll this thread.
Thanks
Define relevant.Farisfair, if you don't have anything relevant to add, please don't troll this thread.
Thanks
and nobody likes speeders, cheaters, thieves, liars ( "I dont' remember" my @$$) or a number of other descriptive nouns I can come up with.Anybody can post here. I don't mind hearing other opinions. I actually like it. But I don't need sarcastic comments on my thread. You are free to do it, but it will only distance me away from the objective of getting clear support for my trial on monday.
I don't think anybody likes trolls or haters
Don't get wrapped around the axle about the word "if" in PC1054.1. Read an excerpt from People v. Superior Court (Barrett)1054.1. The prosecuting attorney shall disclose to the defendant or
his or her attorney all of the following materials and information,
if it is in the possession of the prosecuting attorney or if the
prosecuting attorney knows it to be in the possession of the
investigating agencies:
(a) The names and addresses of persons the prosecutor intends to
call as witnesses at trial.
(b) Statements of all defendants.
(c) All relevant real evidence seized or obtained as a part of the
investigation of the offenses charged.
(d) The existence of a felony conviction of any material witness
whose credibility is likely to be critical to the outcome of the
trial.
(e) Any exculpatory evidence.
(f) Relevant written or recorded statements of witnesses or
reports of the statements of witnesses whom the prosecutor intends to
call at the trial, including any reports or statements of experts
made in conjunction with the case, including the results of physical
or mental examinations, scientific tests, experiments, or comparisons
which the prosecutor intends to offer in evidence at the trial.
From the Government Code:A prosecutor has a duty to search for and disclose exculpatory evidence if the evidence is possessed by a person or agency that has been used by the prosecutor or the investigating agency to assist the prosecution or the investigating agency in its work. The important determinant is whether the person or agency has been "acting on the government's behalf" (Kyles v. Whitley, supra, 514 U.S. at p. 437 [115 S.Ct. at p. 1567]) or "assisting the government's case." (In re Brown, supra, 17 Cal.4th at p. 881.)
26500. The district attorney is the public prosecutor, except as otherwise provided by law.
The public prosecutor shall attend the courts, and within his or her discretion shall initiate and conduct on behalf of the people all prosecutions for public offenses.
The Judge won't ask you that... unless he is an idiot... which is a definite possibility. However, if he does ask you anything like that you can simply ask, "Your Honor, I have yet to waive my right not to testify. Is your question a order from the Court that I must waive that right?" Regardless of what he says, you do NOT want to testify as you are not prepared to testify. You are going to court on a discovery defense.And if the judge asks me if I did or did not speed, how should I answer? Should I just say "I prefer to exercise my right to not respond" or "I don't have to answer" ? I mean what's the best way to show him that I won't testify against myself? or should I just say that I don't remember?
I saw the quote you pasted, but shouldn't I be able to say what is the case number or decision number? Is there somewhere I can find that decision?Read an excerpt from People v. Superior Court (Barrett)