Absolutely amazing...
Please excuse me for not knowing how to get to page 2 of this thread. Remember... I'm new here. I didn't know that the page numbers are hidden in the blue header of the thread. I didn't even know any of you were responding here. I just happened to wave the mouse pointer over the header next to the symbol "[1]" and I saw a red number 2.
I probably should be shocked and surprised at the responses, but I'm not... considering the possible sources. My mother always wanted me to become an attorney since I usually win all my court cases on my own without the assistance of attorneys in the courtroom. Now I know why I never became an attorney or anything close to one. Most people in any of those catagories are usually programmed by the outside world and usually presume everything without gathering any facts. The Bible says in Probverbs (my favorite scripture)... "Any enterprise is built by wise planning, becomes strong through common sense and profits wonderfully by keeping abreast of the facts." Proverbs 24:3-4 LB.
I appreciate all of you for contributing in this thread. However, all of you seem to be from the same mold. I have asked the same questions over and over again and no one has answered them as of yet. Instead of just giving me an answer to my questions, everyone is attempting to tell me what they think I am asking. The problem I have seen with people in the legal profession is that they PRESUME TOO MUCH. I don't presume... I do exactly what the above scripture says and then I "Think Outside The Box" regarding the situation. It then shocks the crap out of the officers in the court and I usually win. They don't expect a normal everyday nobody like me to know the laws that they must obey and then make sure that they obey them. But I do know their laws that they must obey and usually better than they know them. I just don't know much about standard courtroom procedure. And that's why I am asking the questions here.
"stephenk"... You keep presuming that I don't know about cross-examination of witnesses. I have already stated and will again... I do know about that, but that is not my question. Also in your post of 03-30-2004 10:45 PM, you have made more presumptions than I could ever imagine. There is nowhere in the California codes where it states that "The State of California is prosecuting the matter on behalf of all citizens of the State of California." The term "citizens" is never mentioned. And as for the terms "human being" or "people", the California codes don't even apply to real people. That was changed years ago. Haven't you read the California Government Code? It tells you right there. I know... I beat a traffic ticket just because of that. And the "police officer" is only a policy enforcement officer and not a representative as you stated. That's why the officer is only a witness in the court trials and not a representative. You have too many presumptions without documentation.
"I AM ALWAYS LIABLE"... I see why you are always liable. You are actually proving it by slandering my name here in my thread within this forum. Liable is when the slander is in a written format. Don't you read Black's Law Dictionary? I really had the presumption that you were willing to participate in an intelligent conversation in this forum. There I go presuming. Well, I suppose I can be wrong sometimes.
First of all, it is Choix and not "Chowder" or "ChowderBrain". It's French... or maybe that's too difficult for your brain to comprehend. I won't apologize for your definite display of your lack of intelligence.
Next you presume that I am a woman. If I AM a woman, then you are right. If I am NOT a woman... another ding-a-ling presumption on your part.
I don't know what's your profession, but you presume things like attorneys always do. That's a @?!# shame... Why? I really thought you were sincere. Since you asked me, I was actually going to give you the information for the court session. But since you have made it such a delectable enjoyment of slandering my name and proceeded attempts of ridicule upon me within my thread of this forum, I'm not going to tell you now. "Open Mouth Insert Foot". So... if you really believe in your heart that the court session is in Van Nuys... then maybe I'll see you there in Van Nuys. Your loss!
Please understand, "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE", you are hereby noticed. I don't have time to put up with your lamebrain comments. I'm on a time schedule to get this completed. If you don't have anything constructive to say, then just read. This thread has become the most viewed thread so far in it's category. I don't mind a little bit of jesting every now and then, but I don't need to hear anything from the peanut gallery. Should you continue with your lamebrain comments that in no way contribute to my thread, then by all means stay out! Otherwise, I will just report you and have you fined. You are welcome to stay in my thread and contribute constructively as the others are now doing, but be sure to keep your lamebrain comments to yourself.
I'm an alternative legal researcher... gang. I have done this for many years. I had a judge in a traffic courtroom literally run out of the courtroom for 40 minutes because of a few simple words I said to him. Why? Because he knew that he would have to pay the $50,000 he was attempting to put on me for such an exorbitant bail in his fraudulent attempt to arrest me for a 6 year old traffic ticket. Two sessions later, all the charges were dismissed against me with no pleas ever entered from either side. Why didn't he enter a plea for me? I took his authority away from him to ever enter a plea in my case, since they don't have the authority to do that anyway.
I don't need anyone’s help with anything else except courtroom procedure of the questions I have asked. If you don't know how to answer the questions, then I just need to go somewhere else to get my answers or do the best I can with what I already know. God always helps me. He never lets me down.
Good night
ChoixDuJour<><