Superintendent lost my daughter's art work

[Silverplum]

I DO need ideas. Mary was very nice, but sometimes people don't know what a signature line is and can't distinguish it from actual "advice" and get offended by an anonymous stranger on the internet.

SeniorJudge is fond of Shakespeare.

 

[HappyHusband]

Very astute of you to mention that, but I imagine you are unaware of the court's recent holding in Elmers v. Regents of the University of California in which the consumption of the work was not the only issue to consider? It set down a four-prong balancing test: amount consumed; adverse heath effects of consumption; amount recovered in excretion; and time elapsed from consumption to excretion.

It's a very rapidly developing area of law, and quite fascinating, IMO.

I was unaware of that, as I did not Shepardize those cases.

If I had, I would have seen that Elmer's overturned Purdue Regents v. Uncle Jack's Yummy Tasty Candy Flavored Thumbtack Co.

 

[moburkes]

Where IS SJ?

 

[Silverplum]

Where IS SJ?

This is one of the many things I would like to know.

 

[moburkes]

I have a feeling that this OP ain't coming back.

 

[HappyHusband]

SeniorJudge is fond of Shakespeare.

I'm fond of pudding.

 

[weenor]

I DO need ideas. Mary was very nice, but sometimes people don't know what a signature line is and can't distinguish it from actual "advice" and get offended by an anonymous stranger on the internet.

Well I would think that there would be a difference between subjectively or objectively offended. If the signature line is offensive to most folks then its objectively offensive. But if offensive to one or two, thereby being subjective offensive, would that necessitate a change? Well since I ponder this and have no imagination, I have no signature line.

 

[Silverplum]

I'm fond of pudding.

I know.

 

[K'Ta]

Oh, how I love this place! I feel so warm and cozy here