Bring-the-heat
Junior Member
What is the name of your state?
New York
---
Background info:
I had problems with a business who refused to provide me with a refund of my deposit. It wasn't until after the BBB contacted them about the complaint I filed did they decide to refund my $$$.
Case closed (so I thought)
After being blantantly told that I was not getting my refund back (but before the out of court settlement in my favor), I anonomously posted only very detailed and FACTUAL information regarding the incident on a public website forum that documents incidents where consumers feel they have been scammed by a business. This triggered a landslide of comments by other consumers who also felt wronged by this same business. Even a former employee joined the condemnation of this business and its owner. There was no such public info on line prior to my initial post.
Presently...
I am now being sued in Small Claims Court by the owner for the max of $5000 for what was written on the summons as "Breach of contract". In court the lawyer pulled me aside before requesting to postpone the trial and told me that the actual reason I was being sued was because the owner was upset by me revealing the details of my incident with his business. The owner's lawyer had copies of these postings in his posession, but also told me (off record) that he didn't think there was a strong case against me and that if he were me, he knew what his defense would be.
This case has been delayed for two more months when the owner can be present to testify as plaintiff.
I'm not sure if I'm being further railroaded here by the plaintiff's lawyer or if he was indeed being helpfull to me. I posted using an alias as most do when posting on i-net forums so how can then prove that I made these postings which state nothing but truth anyway?
Should my defense be any of the following:
1) That wasn't me posting online. Can they legally sequester records from my ISP and trace my IP address back to me? Not that I'm worried that anything I said is slander or defamation, because its not. It's just the facts regarding my interaction with them.
2) This should be dismissed against me because this can be considered as a SLAPP suit - I was posting information for the benifit of the public (Can this defense be used in NY?)
3) What "breach of contract" when there isn't any contract. My only worry is that I was asked to sign what was supposedly a release form in order to receive my refund in check from this business. Although I was not provided a copy, I remember it stating that my endorsement of the check meant I was dismissing this company of any wrong doing and that I would not file any further complaints against them. This is the only contract I can think they are referring too.
Your advice and assistance is greatly appreciated. Thanks so much!
B-T-H
New York
---
Background info:
I had problems with a business who refused to provide me with a refund of my deposit. It wasn't until after the BBB contacted them about the complaint I filed did they decide to refund my $$$.
Case closed (so I thought)
After being blantantly told that I was not getting my refund back (but before the out of court settlement in my favor), I anonomously posted only very detailed and FACTUAL information regarding the incident on a public website forum that documents incidents where consumers feel they have been scammed by a business. This triggered a landslide of comments by other consumers who also felt wronged by this same business. Even a former employee joined the condemnation of this business and its owner. There was no such public info on line prior to my initial post.
Presently...
I am now being sued in Small Claims Court by the owner for the max of $5000 for what was written on the summons as "Breach of contract". In court the lawyer pulled me aside before requesting to postpone the trial and told me that the actual reason I was being sued was because the owner was upset by me revealing the details of my incident with his business. The owner's lawyer had copies of these postings in his posession, but also told me (off record) that he didn't think there was a strong case against me and that if he were me, he knew what his defense would be.
This case has been delayed for two more months when the owner can be present to testify as plaintiff.
I'm not sure if I'm being further railroaded here by the plaintiff's lawyer or if he was indeed being helpfull to me. I posted using an alias as most do when posting on i-net forums so how can then prove that I made these postings which state nothing but truth anyway?
Should my defense be any of the following:
1) That wasn't me posting online. Can they legally sequester records from my ISP and trace my IP address back to me? Not that I'm worried that anything I said is slander or defamation, because its not. It's just the facts regarding my interaction with them.
2) This should be dismissed against me because this can be considered as a SLAPP suit - I was posting information for the benifit of the public (Can this defense be used in NY?)
3) What "breach of contract" when there isn't any contract. My only worry is that I was asked to sign what was supposedly a release form in order to receive my refund in check from this business. Although I was not provided a copy, I remember it stating that my endorsement of the check meant I was dismissing this company of any wrong doing and that I would not file any further complaints against them. This is the only contract I can think they are referring too.
Your advice and assistance is greatly appreciated. Thanks so much!
B-T-H
Last edited: