• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

cracked toooth in restaurant...tho is liable to pay all costs?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

go22

Member
What is the name of your state? new york

my friend said he cracked his tooth in a restaurant earlier this evening while dining on a piece of fruited cake dessert which concealed a fruit pit he could not see resulting in horrific pain and a cracked tooth. he said he cried out in shock and pain, then almost choked to death when he swallowed the cracked tooth which was sizeable, but was able to retrieve the 1/2 of the cracked fruit pit which had lodged between his gum and remainder of the cracked tooth still intact.


he said when he asked the waiter to call the restaurant owner to come to the table, it took the owner 10 minutes to walk over since he was seated with others in the dining room but clearly viewed and heard the entire episiode. all the owner said when he felt and returned the cracked fruit pit to my friend was sorry, but there is nothing i can do.

my friend replied you have liability insurance just for personal injuries resulting in hidden unexpected items in your food you serve to the public in your restaurant which are conceled from the diner's view so you can put a claim in through your insurance company so they will pay the full cost for whatever the dentist needs to do to completely reconstruct the tooth, as well as my trasnportation costs since i no longer drive and each dental visit will cost me about $15.00 round trip by a taxicab since public transportation is not an option.

after much arguing on the owners part the owner finally said send me the dental bill and i will see, but i don't know if you will be paid by the insurance company at all, or when they will pay you if they decide to pay for it.

my friend said the owner did not seem sorry at all but really seemed very annoyed. he also said he did not think the owner would submit any claim thru his insurance company.

my friend replied his last dental appointment was 2 months ago, had no problems but just a cleaning performed, and that when he walked into his restaurant without any tooth problems tonight, ate the food his waiter served him, and then almost choked to death when he accidently swallowed the cracked tooth from the hidden fruit pit in his fruit cake, was uffering tooth pain, it would stand to reason that the restaurant owner is legally responsible to put a claim thru his ins. co., so they will pay for all the costs to have the tooth professionally fixed by my friends dentist, and pay for all transportation costs, especially since his dentist is only accessible by using a taxi cab and not public transportation.

my friend asked the owner for his business card and then in his presence and the presence of all present dining with my friend, he my wrote the date and that that he ate a piece of fruited cake, and the topping had a concealed fruit pit which when he bit down cracked his tooth. he also wrote owner will pay for all dental and transportation dental costs. he asked the owner to sign it and the owner just scribbled beneath what my friend wrote. of course his signature was not his full first and last name according to the front of his business card which listed his name in print along with the name, address and telephone of his retaurant. (bw the business card also stated all baking done on premises).

can anyone post and state in the above case of the restaurant owner is legally liable to pay the total cost for the complete tooth reconstruction, as well as the taxi transportation costs my friend will have to pay for each dental visit as a direct result of this dental personal injury

also what if he never hears from him again after he gives him the dental and taxi cab receipts should he put a claim through small claims court in new york which maximum is $5,000.00 and just list the court costs, lost wages from work he has to incur, any pain meds he must take, round trip taxi cab dental transportation costs, and the full dental reconstruction bill, and how long should he wait if he never hears anything before filing in small claims court?

thanks in advance for any and all replies:).What is the name of your state?
 


go22

Member
so sorry for the duplicate post....and thanks so much for all replies.....

my friend said it was a slice of cherry cheesecake.
 

go22

Member
forgot to post that another friend went out and made a xerox of the guest check since my friend requested a separate one only for his meal, and then my friend also paid with his visa only for his food bill. in addition to the information he wrote on the back of the proprietor's buisiness card which also included the proprietors scribbled signature or what he calls his signature my friend wanted to have as much proof in his possession as possible so he could either recoup all costs he would have to pay beforehand associated with this dental personal injury either via the proprietors liability insurance or in a new york small claims court.

i also fogot to ask if the owner puts the claim thru does anyone know the timeframe before my friend receives his total costs submitted, and also if the proprietor does not put the claim thru what are the odds of my friend going to and winning his case in a new york small claims court with all the proof he has in his possession for the dental personal injury.

apologies again**************.at my age it is a bit hard to remember everything but i thank everyone who replies:).
 

justalayman

Senior Member
my friend replied you have liability insurance just for personal injuries resulting in hidden unexpected items in your food you serve to the public in your restaurant which are conceled from the diner's view so you can put a claim in through your insurance company so they will pay the full cost for whatever the dentist needs to do to completely reconstruct the tooth, as well as my trasnportation costs since i no longer drive and each dental visit will cost me about $15.00 round trip by a taxicab since public transportation is not an option.

the bolded part is the problem, and your misunderstanding, of the restaraunts liability. A cherry pit in a cherry pie is not a foreign object and can be reasonably expected to be found in a cherry pie. Due to that fact, the restaraunt is not liable.

Go from there. If they offer to assist with payment, accept it and be grateful because they really don't have to.
 

go22

Member
hi justalayman:),

thank you so much for your kind reply, and i also thank everyone who responded to my thread.

it is truly an unfortunate situation, but i will pass the advisement on to my friend, and perhaps when he gives his paid dental bill in person to this restaurant owner he will honor the payment.

thanks again....
 
Last edited:

jdmba

Member
the bolded part is the problem, and your misunderstanding, of the restaraunts liability. A cherry pit in a cherry pie is not a foreign object and can be reasonably expected to be found in a cherry pie. Due to that fact, the restaraunt is not liable.

Go from there. If they offer to assist with payment, accept it and be grateful because they really don't have to.
I think you're jumping the gun by assuming that a person can reasonably expect to find a cherry pit in a cherry pie...especially if such a pit can damage one's tooth. That question would be for the fact finder in a lawsuit to decide...and he/she/they might not agree with you after hearing all of the evidence.
 

justalayman

Senior Member
I think you're jumping the gun by assuming that a person can reasonably expect to find a cherry pit in a cherry pie...especially if such a pit can damage one's tooth. That question would be for the fact finder in a lawsuit to decide...and he/she/they might not agree with you after hearing all of the evidence.
Ok, let me rephrase that.



You are correct. One should not expect to find a cherry pit in a pitted cherry pie BUT you should also not be totally surprised to find this naturally occuring pit in a cherry pie either. You should also understand that a cherry pit in a cherry pie is not considered a foreign object and it is reasonable, normal, and legally acceptable to find one occasionally.



FDA regulations of cherries require there be less than 1 pit in 20 oz. of canned pitted cherries. It is simply impossible to guarantee 100% that there will be no cherry pits in a bunch of commercially processed cherries.
 

You Are Guilty

Senior Member
The problem is that the foreign v. "natural" object discussion is only applicable to a warranty theory. A recent case with a good discussion (starts about halfway through)
http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2006/2006_26235.htm

As you can see, there's also negligence, and products liability causes of action. End result, it's probably worth filing the small claims case as the insurer will probably just pay the claim rather than risk litigating it.
 

justalayman

Senior Member
As you can see, there's also negligence, and products liability causes of action. End result, it's probably worth filing the small claims case as the insurer will probably just pay the claim rather than risk litigating it.
This is off topic from the original post but;
Don't leave us hanging. What was the outcome or hasnt it been adjudicated as of yet?

I am amazed that nobody brought up the defense of lack of proof that there ever was anything in the burger. In todays litigious and lazy society, it is not uncommon to try and take advantage of the food service industry. Without proof, how could the plaintiff prove there was anything in the burger at all, especially as opposed to the bun (which wouldn;t remove Wendys from the case but it would remove the manufacturer of the patty).

While I would love to see a 100% guarantee that all foodstuffs were absolutely without any possibility of causing something like this, I just find it somewhat unreasonable to expect Wendys, or in the case of the OP, the restaurant owner to 100% inspect everything that ever crosses their counter. The producer of the product, if anybody, should carry the responsibility in both situations. Is Wendys supposed to x-ray all their burgers and buns? Is the OPs restaurant supposed to strain and hand inspect the cherries as well as every other foodstuff that could conceivably hide a damaging item?

Just not practical and prohibitively expensive.

In the OPs case, as long as the cherries had passed FDA regs, they should be considered safe. In the Wendy's case, I still am amazed that without proof of a damaging object except for the damaged tooth, the case is proceeding, especially after the finger situation of a year or so ago.
 

teflon_jones

Senior Member
The original post could have been about 5 sentences long and gotten the entire point across. Please learn to summarize! ;)

It would be a judgement call on whether it's reasonable to expect a pit in the pie. However, as You Are Guilty said, the restaurant's insurance company will probably just settle to save themselves the time and money it'll take to fight it.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top