Am I entitled to the difference in modifiaction?

[Silverplum]

No, I do not need to re-read the statute.

You never answered my q as to whether or not you are applying the statute that was law at the time, or using current statute instead.

 

[BelizeBreeze]

Can someone tell me is there a statute of Limitations in this situation?

Yes.

If so, can someone direct me to it? Exact location?
Thanks.

No. You have continually stated you know the law better than others here so look for it yourself.

 

[ceara19]

Yeah, but I direct your pretty eyes to my post #9 in this thread, wherein I specifically took responsibility for this one, 'cause it's my state.

Thank you!!! You wouldn't happen to be in the mood to head over to the GP rights forums and take the blame for the laws in Florida, would you?

 

[TampaBayDiva]

Ahem.....Ahem.....
ladies and gentlemen......what was that you were saying about the statute of limitations regarding child support????
Read this and talk to me after this is digested...lol

(Colo. 1999). Consequently, the applicable statute of limitations is the twenty-year period prescribed in § 13-52-102(2)(a), C.R.S. 2000 for execution upon judgments of every kind


Any questions????????comments????????
And yes, I was telling a true story.

 

[Silverplum]

No. You have continually stated you know the law better than others here so look for it yourself.

I even gave her a link. To the law. As in, all of the family law.

Thank you!!! You wouldn't happen to be in the mood to head over to the GP rights forums and take the blame for the laws in Florida, would you?

Hmmm. I am not in FL, I have been freezing dang cold for months, trudging through snow, ruining two tires in the biggest pothole ever, and I am still not in FL. Hmmmm.

I'm gonna have to go to lunch or something and think that one over!

 

[ceara19]

Ahem.....Ahem.....
ladies and gentlemen......what was that you were saying about the statute of limitations regarding child support????
Read this and talk to me after this is digested...lol

(Colo. 1999). Consequently, the applicable statute of limitations is the twenty-year period prescribed in § 13-52-102(2)(a), C.R.S. 2000 for execution upon judgments of every kind


Any questions????????comments????????
And yes, I was telling a true story.

Well goodie for you! But you are forgetting one very important thing. The statute that you have quoted has NOTHING to do with the SOL to APPEAL an order issued by a competent court. Care to try again?

 

[TampaBayDiva]

Oh and by the way.....
Silverplum, thanks for the link.

 

[Silverplum]

Ahem.....Ahem.....
ladies and gentlemen......what was that you were saying about the statute of limitations regarding child support????
Read this and talk to me after this is digested...lol
(Colo. 1999). Consequently, the applicable statute of limitations is the twenty-year period prescribed in § 13-52-102(2)(a), C.R.S. 2000 for execution upon judgments of every kind
Any questions????????comments????????
And yes, I was telling a true story.

My comment is that the law you are quoting is from 1999. Your mod was in 1995.

Uh..."lol" right back atcha.

By the way, you are so very welcome for my post in which I gave you a link to the CO self help domestic law center. It was so gracious of you to thank me, instead of coming back with a snotty little comment, as so many common ingrates would do.

Oh and by the way.....
Silverplum, thanks for the link.

Ah, yes, you are quite welcome.

 

[BelizeBreeze]

Well goodie for you! But you are forgetting one very important thing. The statute that you have quoted has NOTHING to do with the SOL to APPEAL an order issued by a competent court. Care to try again?

In re Marriage of Rappe, 650 P.2d 1352 (Colo. App. 1982).
In re Marriage of Jaeger, 883 P.2d 577 (Colo. App. 1994).

39 Colo. App. 34, 561 P.2d 20 (1977)

 

[ceara19]

In re Marriage of Rappe, 650 P.2d 1352 (Colo. App. 1982).
In re Marriage of Jaeger, 883 P.2d 577 (Colo. App. 1994).

39 Colo. App. 34, 561 P.2d 20 (1977)

The last 2 cites will definitely take the wind out of the OP's sails. I'll have to trust that the first case is along the same lines. It 605 PAGES long, so I don't think I'll get around to reading it today. BTW - Love the new sig!