Bad replies

[AlanShore]

and if hillbilly Jimbo knew anything about the procedures of the California court system, he'd know to whom the motion for discovery should be served upon and when.

But he's shown how little actual LEGAL knowledge he has so i'm not holding my breath on that one.

I completely concur beyond all reasonable doubt.

 

[Jim_bo]

I see that SeniorJudge demonstrated in the other thread the problem you have. You repeated pointed to a statute as justification for violating posted speed limits, but failed to read other sections of the statute's that blow your justification out of the water. I commend you on your research, but sometimes pointing out a specific statute without understanding how other statutes affect the interpretation of said statute is the wrong course of action.

Yes, this forum is not just for legal professionals, but when you cite specific statutes and/or case law, you present a familiarity with the law that is confusing and misleading, particularly if you are wrong.

First of all, I am not wrong. If I am, there are several judges who have sided with me who are wrong also.

Second, you are presenting a confusing point if you want to argue something from another thread. I would invite you to post your opinions in that thread and I will respond directly.

Third, I have never posted anything that says it is ok to violate a posted speed limit. I have pointed out that frequently posted speed limits are unjustified and unenforcable. I have pointed out that the basic speed law is based on the premise of driving at a speed that is unsafe for persons and property, not on the premise of exceeding a posted speed limit. So, I am not exactly sure what you are refering to.


The bottom line is this: You can argue what you would like the law to say, but I will stick to what it DOES say. I have demonstrated several times that holding the state accountable to the adherance of the law (as it tries to hold me accountable) is a viable defense. You may as well argue that fire is not hot! I am only here to offer a bit of that experience to anyone who would like to hold the state accountable for its actions. Now, what is wrong with that?

 

[Jim_bo]

and if hillbilly Jimbo knew anything about the procedures of the California court system, he'd know to whom the motion for discovery should be served upon and when.

But he's shown how little actual LEGAL knowledge he has so i'm not holding my breath on that one.

Well.... why don't you review PC 1054 and 1054.1 and GC 26500 and maybe you can tell me about the proper way to file a motion for discovery. If I am wrong and you are so hell bent on showing that, quote the section of law that proves me wrong. Or, maybe you can reply with a another ambiguous four year old retort.

 

[BelizeBreeze]

The bottom line is this: You can argue what you would like the law to say, but I will stick to what it DOES say.

If that's the case then why are you serving the District attorny with a motion for discovery when you should KNOW on whom such a motion should be served upon in TRAFFIC COURT.

I have demonstrated several times that holding the state accountable to the adherance of the law (as it tries to hold me accountable) is a viable defense.

As well as holding YOU accountable to provide citations for your ignorance.

You may as well argue that fire is not hot! I am only here to offer a bit of that experience to anyone who would like to hold the state accountable for its actions. Now, what is wrong with that?

and your EXPERIENCE tells you that you have to file a motion to discovery on the District Attorney for a traffic offense? I guess then that California should change is rules of procedure.

 

[Jim_bo]

I completely concur beyond all reasonable doubt.

See my above post.

 

[AlanShore]

And once again I concur with BelizeBreeze....

 

[Jim_bo]

If that's the case then why are you serving the District attorny with a motion for discovery when you should KNOW on whom such a motion should be served upon in TRAFFIC COURT.

As well as holding YOU accountable to provide citations for your ignorance.

and your EXPERIENCE tells you that you have to file a motion to discovery on the District Attorney for a traffic offense? I guess then that California should change is rules of procedure.

Well, since you are so intellegent, who should I serve a request for discovery upon and what section of CA law allows for it? Which "rule of procedure" are you refering to above that would need to be changed?

I have seen lots of inflamitory garbage spew from you, but I have not seen one reference to actual law that backs up anything you say.

 

[Jim_bo]

And once again I concur with BelizeBreeze....

It's a free country. You two can be wrong as often as you like.

 

[Jim_bo]

By the way, BB,

I concur that being a miserable human being does not mean that you are not right, it only contributes to the fact that you are so frequently wrong.

Jimbo

 

[BelizeBreeze]

Well, since you are so intellegent, who should I serve a request for discovery upon and what section of CA law allows for it? Which "rule of procedure" are you refering to above that would need to be changed?

I have seen lots of inflamitory garbage spew from you, but I have not seen one reference to actual law that backs up anything you say.

Just because I know the answer doesn't mean I have to teach you. You've been spouting your so-called legal knowledge so answer the question. It should be easy since you've been giving LEGAL ADVICE here.

 

[Jim_bo]

Just because I know the answer doesn't mean I have to teach you. You've been spouting your so-called legal knowledge so answer the question. It should be easy since you've been giving LEGAL ADVICE here.

I see.... its the ole' four year old "I know but I'm not gonna tell" defense. Very shrewd.

Hhhmmm.... I am wondering if I should respond with a "double-dog-dare"......

 

[Ozark_Sophist]

Jumbo, You have actually said it was a crime to follow the speed limits, so...

 

[BelizeBreeze]

I see.... its the ole' four year old "I know but I'm not gonna tell" defense. Very shrewd.

Hhhmmm.... I am wondering if I should respond with a "double-dog-dare"......

Answer the question. According the California Court Procedures for TRAFFIC COURT, on whom do you serve the motion for discovery?????

we're still waiting.

 

[Jim_bo]

Jumbo, You have actually said it was a crime to follow the speed limits, so...

Inbred, where did I say that?

 

[BelizeBreeze]

Answer the question. According the California Court Procedures for TRAFFIC COURT, on whom do you serve the motion for discovery?????

we're still waiting.