amberlea434
Member
One more thing to add...
My husband spoke with his attorney a few days ago (which is actually another attorney at the same law firm because the attorney that represented my husband left the firm right after the hearing to start his own practice. Needless to say, it's been rather crazy, seeing as he wasn't at the hearing and he's having to keep checking back with the old attorney). He's saying that from what the order states, he understands it to mean that, regardless of whether or not the ex submits the bills in the 30 day time period, my husband still has to either pay them or petition the court for a ruling. Obviously, he's not positive of this because he wasn't the one that drew up the order. He's trying to get in touch with the old attorney to find out. Could this be a possibility, though, since there wasn't any clarification that the bills would be null and void after 30 days?
My husband spoke with his attorney a few days ago (which is actually another attorney at the same law firm because the attorney that represented my husband left the firm right after the hearing to start his own practice. Needless to say, it's been rather crazy, seeing as he wasn't at the hearing and he's having to keep checking back with the old attorney). He's saying that from what the order states, he understands it to mean that, regardless of whether or not the ex submits the bills in the 30 day time period, my husband still has to either pay them or petition the court for a ruling. Obviously, he's not positive of this because he wasn't the one that drew up the order. He's trying to get in touch with the old attorney to find out. Could this be a possibility, though, since there wasn't any clarification that the bills would be null and void after 30 days?