Temporary Injunction...Is It Still Valid?

[Chamillion]

What is the name of your state? TX

Back in September of last year when my custody case began, the associate judge entered a temporary injunction prohibiting my ex's boyfriend from being in my daughter's presence.

We've since gone to final trial and I received custody. There was nothing mentioned about the injunction in the court about the injunction, and I'm wondering is it still valid. The way the associate judge made it seem, she would have to file a motion to have the injunction lifted even after final orders are entered.

The reason that I am asking is because I was made aware that my ex has the boyfriend living with her again, and he's been around my daughter the entire weekend and I truly fear for her safety being in that house with him.

Even after final orders are entered, does the injunction remain on her boyfriend, or would I have to take it back to court?

 

[Bloopy]

Yes.

But you already have custody. From what I remember Mom's poor judgement was putting her custody at risk. It's already gone. There's not more more for you to "win."

Yes, I get you don't want him around, but Mom has the right to be stupid. You can push it, but you won't get far.

 

[Chamillion]

Yes.

But you already have custody. From what I remember Mom's poor judgement was putting her custody at risk. It's already gone. There's not more more for you to "win."

Yes, I get you don't want him around, but Mom has the right to be stupid. You can push it, but you won't get far.

I'm not really trying to win anything here, I just want to ensure my daughter isn't in danger, and this guy is clearly a danger to her. He's not even allowed around his own kids, but she lets him around ours?? I'm sorry, I'm just really upset right now.

When you say yes, does that mean the injunction remains in place?

 

[Bloopy]

I think the order is still in place.

Being armed with that knowledge won't get you far in reality.

Sucks, eh?

 

[Chamillion]

I think the order is still in place.

Being armed with that knowledge won't get you far in reality.

Sucks, eh?

Yea it does! I really hate this for our daughter...and now she's about to have another kid, with that molesting prick! How I WISH stupidity was PAINFUL!!

 

[Inquiry123]

Chamillion:

I'm not familiar with you situation...but I don't know many parents who would be comfortable having their children around a convicted sex offender. Wouldn't a petition for supervised visitation be the next logical option?

§ 153.076. DUTY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION. (a) The court
shall order that each conservator of a child has a duty to inform
the other conservator of the child in a timely manner of significant
information concerning the health, education, and welfare of the
child.
(b) The court shall order that each conservator of a child
has the duty to inform the other conservator of the child if the
conservator resides with for at least 30 days, marries, or intends
to marry a person who the conservator knows:
(1) is registered as a sex offender under Chapter 62,
Code of Criminal Procedure; or
(2) is currently charged with an offense for which on
conviction the person would be required to register under that
chapter.
(c) The notice required to be made under Subsection (b) must
be made as soon as practicable but not later than the 40th day after
the date the conservator of the child begins to reside with the
person or the 10th day after the date the marriage occurs, as
appropriate. The notice must include a description of the offense
that is the basis of the person's requirement to register as a sex
offender or of the offense with which the person is charged.
(d) A conservator commits an offense if the conservator
fails to provide notice in the manner required by Subsections (b)
and (c). An offense under this subsection is a Class C misdemeanor.