• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Invalid Note on Deed of Trust

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

gb76087

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Arizona
Not sure this is the right forum, but I'll start here.
Long story, short. Financial advisor put me in a Deed of Trust, secured by a Promissory Note. I have the right to foreclose on the property per the Deed of Trust. However, the Promissory Note is invalid due to the Arizona laws concerning property less than 2 acres and residential use.
My question is whether or not I might have a case against the Financial Advisor for failing to understand the Arizona real estate laws, thus failing in his fiduciary(?)/ professional(?) duties and putting me in a situation where I was not protected as led to believe?
 


Dewey

Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Arizona
Not sure this is the right forum, but I'll start here.
Long story, short. Financial advisor put me in a Deed of Trust, secured by a Promissory Note. I have the right to foreclose on the property per the Deed of Trust. However, the Promissory Note is invalid due to the Arizona laws concerning property less than 2 acres and residential use.
My question is whether or not I might have a case against the Financial Advisor for failing to understand the Arizona real estate laws, thus failing in his fiduciary(?)/ professional(?) duties and putting me in a situation where I was not protected as led to believe?
Invalid how? I have a Promissory Note secured by a Deed of Trust on a property less than 2 acres and residential in Arizona.

I think I know what you are referring to--the anti-defiency statute?

A.R.S. §33-729(A) in 1971 to limit the right of certain purchase money mortgagees to obtain a deficiency judgment if the security does not exceed two and one-half acres and is utilized as either a one-family or single two-family dwelling. For the purposes of A.R.S. §33-729(A), a "purchase money mortgage" is one given concurrently with a conveyance of real estate between the seller and the buyer, or given to secure a loan to pay all or part of the purchase price of the dwelling. When such a purchase money mortgage exists, A.R.S. §33-729(A) provides the following limitation:

…[T]he lien of judgment in an action to foreclose such mortgage shall not extend to any other property of the judgment debtor, nor may general execution be issued against the judgment debtor to enforce such judgment…
This anti-deficiency statute expressly limits the purchase money mortgagee who initiates foreclosure to only those proceeds of the foreclosure sale. By its express terms, the statute applies only to actual foreclosure situations; it does not expressly bar the right of a purchase money mortgagee to elect under A.R.S. §33-722 to waive the security and sue on the debt.
Did your borrower use the money to purchase the property?

What it means is that if your borrower used the money to pay all or some of the purchase price of the property, then defaults and you are forced to foreclose, you can cannot sue him for the difference of what you recovered from the foreclosure and value of the Promissory Note.

This is where it would be wise for you to forget the Deed of Trust and sue him on the Promissory Note.

However, if your borrower did not use the money to pay all or some of the purchase price of the property, but instead purchased a boat--you are entitled to sue him for the deficiency of the foreclosure and the value of the Promissory Note.

Your Promissory Note secured by a Deed of Trust is not invalid.
 
Last edited:

gb76087

Junior Member
Did your borrower use the money to purchase the property?

What it means is that if your borrower used the money to pay all or some of the purchase price of the property, then defaults and you are forced to foreclose, you can cannot sue him for the difference of what you recovered from the foreclosure and value of the Promissory Note.

This is where it would be wise for you to forget the Deed of Trust and sue him on the Promissory Note.

However, if your borrower did not use the money to pay all or some of the purchase price of the property, but instead purchased a boat--you are entitled to sue him for the deficiency of the foreclosure and the value of the Promissory Note.

Your Promissory Note secured by a Deed of Trust is not invalid.
Yes, the borrower used the money as "purchase money". I understand I can not sue the "borrower" for the difference. The thing here is, the borrower was not my financial planner. The financial planner had all the dealings/communications with the borrower. I want to go after the financial planner for some sum because he did not understand the laws and the transaction/Note is worthless since I cannot sue the borrower. IMHO the financial planner was less than knowledgeable of all of the ramifications and nuisances. I admit, I was too, but the financial planner was the person I was trusting to keep me out of these types of situations.
 

Dewey

Member
Yes, the borrower used the money as "purchase money". I understand I can not sue the "borrower" for the difference. The thing here is, the borrower was not my financial planner. The financial planner had all the dealings/communications with the borrower. I want to go after the financial planner for some sum because he did not understand the laws and the transaction/Note is worthless since I cannot sue the borrower. IMHO the financial planner was less than knowledgeable of all of the ramifications and nuisances. I admit, I was too, but the financial planner was the person I was trusting to keep me out of these types of situations.

Yes, I was afraid you were going to say that the borrower used the money as 'purchase money."

You did see that suing just on the Promissory Note is an option?

I'm not an attorney, so I don't know what you can do about the bad planning from your financial advisor. Sorry.:(
 

gb76087

Junior Member
You did see that suing just on the Promissory Note is an option?
Not an option, as I NOW understand the Az law.
Purchase money, under 2 acres, single family resident, no recourse except foreclosure, no suing for deficiency.
That's why I'm thinking about going after the Financial Planner.
 

Dewey

Member
Not an option, as I NOW understand the Az law.
Purchase money, under 2 acres, single family resident, no recourse except foreclosure, no suing for deficiency.
That's why I'm thinking about going after the Financial Planner.
Well, waiving the security of the Deed of Trust and suing on the Promissory Note for "purchase money" was an option until Baker v. Gardner 1988.

Sue or Foreclose?

My situation is different since it wasn't "purchase money."
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top