I only had the idea due the numerous debt settlement ads I see.
I understand the principle behind paying the balance in full, but then how does that explain these debt settlement companies?
I know some are fraudulent- they take your money and provide no services.
But some have to be legitimate.
And for those legitimate ones, that means the creditors agreed to take less than 100% of what was owed.
That means the system is allowing situations in which less than 100% of a balance due is paid and the account is settled.
So I don't understand why people would look down on me for exploring an option that the system has. Its not cheating the system when they AGREE to take less than 100%. I can understand if this has never been done before and here I come asking to take less than 100% with a slogan of "theres a first time for everything". But thats not the case. There are banks/creditors that are taking less than 100%. For whatever reason they are.
Am I to be insulted for considering that an option?