I don't think you jumped to conclusions anymore than LD did with her "speculations" and double talk to justify forcing men to pay alimony and women to receive alimony.(I saw OP posted below this one but didn't read it yet - bear that in mind lol)
Yes, you're right. I did - admittedly - sort of jump to conclusions and I really shouldn't have done so. You've made excellent points that I didn't take into consideration until you pointed them out - and even if those points don't apply here it was still an angle I should have thought about before jumping in.
She is bent on this tradition although the fact is that women have manipulated the system to where they get preference over men in getting jobs and a variety of other legislated benefits.
Now that these legislated benefits are available to women, she believes that it's a woman's prerogative whether to take advantage of the benefits or just sit back and force a man to pay them. I say force the women to take advantage of their right to get employment over a man and make them work for a living.
In other words she wants her cake and eat it too.
She wants women superior in standing to men and won't be happy until women run everything in this country and men are just slaves to them.
WOMAN POWER, right LD!!