That's exactly what I'll be doing just like my previous post stated & that's waiting for answers from the attorney. Obnoxious? It's not being abnoxious but it is discussion.
And this is not a debate board. You asked questions, and you received answers.
Let me ask you guys something? Where in any of my previous posts have I said that I'm not happy with what answers that have been given to me? Where have I said with absolute certainly that we have a definite malpractice/wrongful death claim?
There appears to be rather compelling evidence that you disagree with what you've been told....
...otherwise we wouldn't have a 3-page long thread.
However, others have came back at me to say we absolutely have nothing without question when they don't have access to the information/medical records. That's what is hard for me to understand.
Then why did you even post? Seriously. This is not brain surgery. It's a very simple process: you list the relevant information, ask your question, and receive responses based upon what you've written.
But when you didn't receive the answer you want, you disagreed because we don't have all of the information with which to make such a conclusion.
What exactly did you expect to happen here?
I'm no expert but this really amazes me from so called experts that they would form this conclusion when they have no proof either way. Opinions are fine with me but you have members here stating there's nothing for a claim when they have nothing to prove that.
That is painfully obvious. What amazes the rest of us is why you keep posting. You do not agree with what you've read, you've obviously decided that we are all in the wrong, but yet you still insist on posting for no reason other than to keep flogging a dead horse which has been due for a visit to the glue factory for at least 2 of the 3 pages in this thread.
Please.
Stop.
There's nobody seeming to even say well maybe you have something because we don't have the medical records. How many of you work for or support the medical field may I ask?
You have been answered by professionals, laymen and those who have spent many years either studying the field or have amassed considerable experience within that field. You decided to check credentials now because....why? You didn't hear what you wanted to hear? So we would have been deemed perfectly credible if the answer had been "yes, you have a case, sue them for $12.3 million dollars"?
It seems like most are saying we have nothing & it makes me wonder how many of you work in the medical field that would go against this no matter what. I'm done discussing this so let me have more comments & I'll ignore them. I'll just post back when answers are finally given from the attorney. Thanks!
That's ok. It's pointless. There is really only one reason you would post back; to either have the last word (many posters end up having apparently chronic cases of lastworditis), or to confirm what I predict will happen: you will regale us with the tale of an attorney who has taken your case and is adamant you'll be successful in court.
Either way, good luck to you and your family.