I am NOT implying she is incapable, she has an MA in education, she is a pretty smart cookie...what I am saying is she doesn't want to have to work (or doesn't think she has to)...
Rant accepted, I could be a woman just as easy as a man. I know plenty of women who are doing amazing things in the 40's and 50's with plenty of hardship they had to endure in their life before getting there. This is not gender specific I just happen to be a man.
My point was THIS particular person, my wife, was a SAHM, and I supported her and gave her every opportunity to enjoy life, not have to work, be there for her kids, etc. She knows we are headed to D/S but I know her well enough to know she really doesn't want to have to work or maybe at best dabble in a part time job.
I just don't know how the courts view it, is alimony based on the theory that she will get a job, will pay her own bills, will get her own health care...at _some_ point down the road?
Clearly, for the forseeable future I am on the hook for everything, and as such I am (to put it a business-like manner) providing the same things (albeit at much more expense, 2 houses, 2 cars, 2 taxes) I was during the marriage? Does that mean she is going to do both mine and hers grocery shopping, laundry,etc (heck I'll get the boys off to school, clean the house on weekends, make 1/2 the meals just like I am doing now plus a 9-10 hour a day job).