Gen_xer1983
Junior Member
What is the name of your state? AZ
Hello all!
This is my first time posting. So bare with me as I learn the ropes and my way around.
I will first make this short and for anyone who needs details can ask me questions. That will help me process things much better. So thanks in advance.
OUR CASE: SUMMARIZED
November 11, 2008 - House-fire. It was determined accidental
December 18th, 2008, we hired a Public Adjuster (PA) because the Insurance company was delaying the walk-through of the non-salvageable content. Not returning calls and canceling the walk through.
March 5th, 2008 we terminated the PA . We were not happy with his work, he did not follow through on some of the things he promised, did not give us timely updates (we had to keep on him), refused to put a certified signature at the bank and insists we sign the checks over to him then he writes us a check. In addition, he cancelled appointments we made to discuss our claims. Sent the structural claim without our approval and did not include the two bedrooms, bathroom, hallway and several other damages. When we asked to speak with him about going forward he put us off and never tried to reschedule even after we asked him to work things out with us.
After he was terminated him, we sent a copy to the Insurance Company. But they still refused to work with us, until I mentioned the Dept. of Insurance.
After the PA got his termination letter he immediately contacted the Insurance Company letting them know that he still has an interest in our claim. We are not sure if he has put a lien on our claim or not.
Despite our demands to honor the Termination, the Insurance Company continues to keep him in the loop and said they have to include his name on all checks until they receive a release from him.
March 24th, 2008 - We hired an Attorney. All we wanted to do was pay a fair amount to the PA that would end the contract.
April 18, 2008 - The PA accepted 4000.00 which is 6,000.00 less than what he originally invoiced. We included a letter basically protecting our rights. The PA refused to sign and sent a “Mutual Release.” Our Attorney advised us that if we sign the Mutual Release it could allow the Insurance Company to blame both us and the PA and deny our claim. And if that happened we would have to hire an Attorney (he does not wish to take our case) and file a bad faith lawsuit against the PA and the Insurance company.
May 5th, 2008 – PA refuses our terms and conditions and sends a “Mutual Release” basically stating that he is not liable for any damages, we cannot sue him for any damages, and vice versa. The Insurance Company continues to demand the Release.
Our Attorney advised that if we sign this Mutual Release, it could prompt the Insurance Company to blame the PA. And since we released him from the claim fully without taking any responsibility, that would also give reason to blame us and then deny our claim.
May 17th, 2008 – We file a complaint against the Insurance Company for:
1. Delays, it has been 7 months and no dwelling claim;
2. Refusing to honor the Termination of the PA
3. Refusing to write the checks without the PA's name
4. Continuing to include the PA in our Claim for which we have no idea wether they are communicating or not.
Against the PA:
1. Refusing to honor the termination letter
2. Continuing to communicate with the Insurance company after he has been terminated.
3. Not CC(ing) us on any of his communications or work that still needs to be done since he claims to be our represntative.
4. Other complaints that gave us reason to fire him.
May 18th, 2008 – Then we get this curve ball… Our Attorney informs us that the PA has agreed to put a clause into the Mutual Release stating that:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, client may pursue any potential claim against PA in the event that Allstate Insurance Company makes any allegation or claim against PA, or names PA as a non-party at fault in any potential litigation, arising out of PA’s representation of client in connection with the subject property damage claim.
OUR DILEMMA:
We seem to have three options here:
Option 1: Settle for a lower amount and sign the Mutual Release: The release seems okay with that statement in there but it doesn't say anything about the Insurance Company blaming US when it was the PA's fault. This is where the Dept. of Insurance's investigation will reveal if the PA or Insurance Company is at fault for delays etc.
Option 2: Honor the contract and pay the PA his 10%. This way no one signs away their rights. With the Dept. of Insurance involved, I would think both the PA and the Insurance Company would ensure they do the right thing. My question is, can we force the PA to honor his end of the contract? Can Dept. of Insurance make him?
Option 3: General Release and pay his original 10,000.00 invoice. Have him sign a general release that states he is releasing us from the contract and payment does not mean we are not agreeing to his charges. Looks like we back at Option 1.
Please advise... Thanks
Hello all!
This is my first time posting. So bare with me as I learn the ropes and my way around.
I will first make this short and for anyone who needs details can ask me questions. That will help me process things much better. So thanks in advance.
OUR CASE: SUMMARIZED
November 11, 2008 - House-fire. It was determined accidental
December 18th, 2008, we hired a Public Adjuster (PA) because the Insurance company was delaying the walk-through of the non-salvageable content. Not returning calls and canceling the walk through.
March 5th, 2008 we terminated the PA . We were not happy with his work, he did not follow through on some of the things he promised, did not give us timely updates (we had to keep on him), refused to put a certified signature at the bank and insists we sign the checks over to him then he writes us a check. In addition, he cancelled appointments we made to discuss our claims. Sent the structural claim without our approval and did not include the two bedrooms, bathroom, hallway and several other damages. When we asked to speak with him about going forward he put us off and never tried to reschedule even after we asked him to work things out with us.
After he was terminated him, we sent a copy to the Insurance Company. But they still refused to work with us, until I mentioned the Dept. of Insurance.
After the PA got his termination letter he immediately contacted the Insurance Company letting them know that he still has an interest in our claim. We are not sure if he has put a lien on our claim or not.
Despite our demands to honor the Termination, the Insurance Company continues to keep him in the loop and said they have to include his name on all checks until they receive a release from him.
March 24th, 2008 - We hired an Attorney. All we wanted to do was pay a fair amount to the PA that would end the contract.
April 18, 2008 - The PA accepted 4000.00 which is 6,000.00 less than what he originally invoiced. We included a letter basically protecting our rights. The PA refused to sign and sent a “Mutual Release.” Our Attorney advised us that if we sign the Mutual Release it could allow the Insurance Company to blame both us and the PA and deny our claim. And if that happened we would have to hire an Attorney (he does not wish to take our case) and file a bad faith lawsuit against the PA and the Insurance company.
May 5th, 2008 – PA refuses our terms and conditions and sends a “Mutual Release” basically stating that he is not liable for any damages, we cannot sue him for any damages, and vice versa. The Insurance Company continues to demand the Release.
Our Attorney advised that if we sign this Mutual Release, it could prompt the Insurance Company to blame the PA. And since we released him from the claim fully without taking any responsibility, that would also give reason to blame us and then deny our claim.
May 17th, 2008 – We file a complaint against the Insurance Company for:
1. Delays, it has been 7 months and no dwelling claim;
2. Refusing to honor the Termination of the PA
3. Refusing to write the checks without the PA's name
4. Continuing to include the PA in our Claim for which we have no idea wether they are communicating or not.
Against the PA:
1. Refusing to honor the termination letter
2. Continuing to communicate with the Insurance company after he has been terminated.
3. Not CC(ing) us on any of his communications or work that still needs to be done since he claims to be our represntative.
4. Other complaints that gave us reason to fire him.
May 18th, 2008 – Then we get this curve ball… Our Attorney informs us that the PA has agreed to put a clause into the Mutual Release stating that:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, client may pursue any potential claim against PA in the event that Allstate Insurance Company makes any allegation or claim against PA, or names PA as a non-party at fault in any potential litigation, arising out of PA’s representation of client in connection with the subject property damage claim.
OUR DILEMMA:
We seem to have three options here:
Option 1: Settle for a lower amount and sign the Mutual Release: The release seems okay with that statement in there but it doesn't say anything about the Insurance Company blaming US when it was the PA's fault. This is where the Dept. of Insurance's investigation will reveal if the PA or Insurance Company is at fault for delays etc.
Option 2: Honor the contract and pay the PA his 10%. This way no one signs away their rights. With the Dept. of Insurance involved, I would think both the PA and the Insurance Company would ensure they do the right thing. My question is, can we force the PA to honor his end of the contract? Can Dept. of Insurance make him?
Option 3: General Release and pay his original 10,000.00 invoice. Have him sign a general release that states he is releasing us from the contract and payment does not mean we are not agreeing to his charges. Looks like we back at Option 1.
Please advise... Thanks
Last edited: