crusecharles
Junior Member
I realize I have fixated on the "standard of living", that is because in the begining, 8 years ago when my mother was not married to either my father or step father and had a job, she based the child support from the "standard of living." If it was based on that before, wouldn't that mean it should be based on "standard of living" now?I will say this:
Stop fixating on your mother and stepfather's "standard of living" and whether that relates to how much support your father pays. Apparently your household's standard of living is largely dependent on your stepfather's income, which has no bearing on the support calculation between your parents. Your stepfather is not responsible for you. Your father and mother are.
Basically, the amount of money it takes to properly care for you is calculated by the court. Your mother is assigned a share and your father is assigned a share, which he pays the custodial parent--your mother. It doesn't matter if your stepfather is a millionaire. You're not his child, you're not his obligation. His money isn't considered.
Yes I realize I am not his obligation, which irritates me more.
In the case that my step-fathers money does not count, then technically my mother is not paying for anything at all for me and my siblings. If my father were to file for me in court, would that come into play and, for a loss of words, give him an advantage?