I bet you can"t answer these questions

[Proserpina]

I do not have the original order . I sure can get it tho. It basically awarded her this due to her not being a US citizen, my refusing to sponser her, and the inability for her to work to support herself.

See, now I KNOW that's not accurate.

Because I'm an immigrant. And that just isn't how it works.

 

[skt2u2]

Ziegler

OK sorry for being rude. But you cannot justify what has been done by the courts. How can you HOORAY for someone who's sole intent is to live in America for free by any means. Don't forget the child .... she has done everything short of kidnapping her to keep her from me. This includes 3 false accusations of sexual abuse. Always occuring at Christmas or Thanksgiving or anyother holiday. Come on sick and corrupt is sick and corrupt. No child deserves rape exams due to vindication

 

[skt2u2]

Answers to your questions

This is how it works here. I will absolutly provide you with the proof now. It is exactly what happened. Are you going to be able to help me? Or is this all just for kicks??

 

[Proserpina]

This is how it works here. I will absolutly provide you with the proof now. It is exactly what happened. Are you going to be able to help me? Or is this all just for kicks??

Okay. Here's the bottom line.

CS is ordered - and actually sounds in line with guidelines now. No going back there unless there's a change.

Spousal support (for whatever reason - it sounds like she got savvy and knew a little bit more about potential sponsorship than you did) is ordered - and if you want to get that changed at this point you're going to have to have a reason to modify the order. You also need to read your decree to see if it IS actually modifiable.

I'd like you to clarify, if you can, her immigration status.

You said first that she was here illegally. How? Did she enter on a tourist visa and overstay? WHEN did she enter?

You never filed anything on her behalf, correct? Not one single form?

Yet she's now a citizen? Are you absolutely SURE about that? Because if she wasn't even a resident as of 2007 when you got divorced, the timing just doesn't work.

 

[Bali Hai]

Okay. Here's the bottom line.

CS is ordered - and actually sounds in line with guidelines now. No going back there unless there's a change.

Spousal support (for whatever reason - it sounds like she got savvy and knew a little bit more about potential sponsorship than you did) is ordered - and if you want to get that changed at this point you're going to have to have a reason to modify the order. You also need to read your decree to see if it IS actually modifiable.

I'd like you to clarify, if you can, her immigration status.

You said first that she was here illegally. How? Did she enter on a tourist visa and overstay? WHEN did she enter?

You never filed anything on her behalf, correct? Not one single form?

Yet she's now a citizen? Are you absolutely SURE about that? Because if she wasn't even a resident as of 2007 when you got divorced, the timing just doesn't work.

Are you going to address her credit card in England also?

 

[skt2u2]

Bet You Can't Answer These Questions

Anybody have anyother input??? You know she wasn't sponsered, she was illegally here when she was awarded the spousal support, she is hiding money in England, and took my wifes money for surgery 6 hours after it was placed into the account for her surgery....money from a judgement on her England credit card account in her name alone.

I did not think anyone could give an answer**************.....impossible to justify ...

Can a county court system be made to justify and if so how does one go about it?

PLEASE>>>put on your thinkin caps.

 

[Bali Hai]

Anybody have anyother input??? You know she wasn't sponsered, she was illegally here when she was awarded the spousal support, she is hiding money in England, and took my wifes money for surgery 6 hours after it was placed into the account for her surgery....money from a judgement on her England credit card account in her name alone.

I did not think anyone could give an answer**************.....impossible to justify ...

Can a county court system be made to justify and if so how does one go about it?

PLEASE>>>put on your thinkin caps.

If you don't like the judges decision, you can appeal to a higher court.

Judge's can do pretty much what they want knowing that even if you win the appeal it's no skin off their nose, but alot of money out of your pocket.

 

[skt2u2]

Bet You Can't Answer These Questions

Even if it is easily proven that the judgements were biased and unjustified...such as the amount of monies awarded were WAY out of bounds based on income and had to be due to my wifes trust fund money which is totally illegal.

 

[mistoffolees]

Even if it is easily proven that the judgements were biased and unjustified...such as the amount of monies awarded were WAY out of bounds based on income and had to be due to my wifes trust fund money which is totally illegal.

First, you haven't answered the questions which would help people here to determine if what you are paying is reasonable.

Second, you already got the answer. You are free to file for a modification if there has been a change of circumstances AND alimony is modifiable. You are also free to appeal if you are within the stated time limits.

I don't know what else you want.

 

[LdiJ]

I do not have the original order . I sure can get it tho. It basically awarded her this due to her not being a US citizen, my refusing to sponser her, and the inability for her to work to support herself.

I think that I get it...

You have a child, and you want that child to remain in the US. Your former wife cannot support herself in the US because you never sponsored her for a green card. The judge is keeping your child in the US but because she cannot work to support herself, the judge is forcing you to support her.

Why didn't you sponsor her for a green card while you were married?

 

[Bali Hai]

I think that I get it...

You have a child, and you want that child to remain in the US. Your former wife cannot support herself in the US because you never sponsored her for a green card. The judge is keeping your child in the US but because she cannot work to support herself, the judge is forcing you to support her.

Why didn't you sponsor her for a green card while you were married?

He says his ex is a dual citizen currently. That being the case, I would think she has the authorization to work here.

If he sponsored her for a green card, how would that have changed anything?

 

[mistoffolees]

He says his ex is a dual citizen currently. That being the case, I would think she has the authorization to work here.

I don't think that has been established. In fact, he's been incredibly evasive about answering questions about the details.

For example, Pro says that the timing he is claiming is not possible - and he hasn't clarified. Not to mention that he refuses to provide any of the exact wording of the decree.

I smell a troll.

 

[Proserpina]

I don't think that has been established. In fact, he's been incredibly evasive about answering questions about the details.

For example, Pro says that the timing he is claiming is not possible - and he hasn't clarified. Not to mention that he refuses to provide any of the exact wording of the decree.

I smell a troll.

Right, there was actually a reason (shocker, huh?) why I was asking for the immigration timeline.

Because to go from zero legal status to citizen in four years without having the spouse sponsor her is simply not possible.

Even if she gained residency under VAWA, the waiting period before you can apply for citizenship is FIVE years - not the usual 3 which applies when you're still married and still living with your sponsor.

So at best she would be able to apply 2012 and most likely not until 2013.

 

[Bali Hai]

Right, there was actually a reason (shocker, huh?) why I was asking for the immigration timeline.

Because to go from zero legal status to citizen in four years without having the spouse sponsor her is simply not possible.

Even if she gained residency under VAWA, the waiting period before you can apply for citizenship is FIVE years - not the usual 3 which applies when you're still married and still living with your sponsor.

So at best she would be able to apply 2012 and most likely not until 2013.

I assume they married here in the US, in 2003. Let's say she gained residency shortly thereafter.

 

[mistoffolees]

I assume they married here in the US, in 2003. Let's say she gained residency shortly thereafter.

Could be. I still think it's a troll.