Can a cop just park on private property in a bar parking lot without owners consent?

[dave33]

there is no case law preventing, the filing of a civil suit against the officers/dept in court for a breach of implied contract, this should be a great test case.

its a new approach, how do you like it? - there is more than one way to prevail in court.

think outside the box, make it a breach of contract issue.

---

one can be right and yet still lose in court by arguing the wrong issue of (tresspassing)

----

let the officers stay as long a they want, just pay the OP when using his property when not engaged in offcial business with this OP or get a warrant.

___

Terrible idea. Implied contract ? Holy toledo! That's ridiculous.

Great test case? I think not.

 

[Dillon]

Terrible idea. Implied contract ? Holy toledo! That's ridiculous.

its my understanding, its not a terrible idea for this OP?

Why, give me some facts why it will not work? courts resolve contract disputes all the time?

yeah, you know it will work when argued correctly, but you and this dept. will not like it.

-----------

give me facts or it is deemed it can work.

----------

you simply saying, "in wont work, it wont work, its ridiculous" wont cut it as a reasonable response to this OP and other posters

---------

here are my facts on implied contract law:

i hope you understand implied contract law. (google implied contracts)

----------

implied contract means,


A legally enforceable agreement that arises from conduct, assumed intentions, some relationship of the immediate parties, or the application of the legal principle of equity.

A contract is implied when a party knowingly accepts a benefit (like parking) from another party in circumstances where the benefit cannot be considered a gift. Therefore, the party accepting the benefit is under a legal obligation to give fair value for the benefit (benefit like parking) received.

---------

-------------- several large signs posted on property -----------

Parking at this Bar is not a free gift, except if one is a customer or engaged in official government
business with the Bar's Owner, all others agree to pay a $50 an hour land use fee when parking
or get a warrant. *****NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL*****

sounds like a reasonable contract offer to me...

--------

 

[dave33]

its my understanding, its not a terrible idea for this OP?

Why, give me some facts why it will not work? courts resolve contract disputes all the time?

yeah, you know it will work when argued correctly, but you and this dept. will not like it.

-----------

give me facts or it is deemed it can work.

----------

you simply saying, "in wont work, it wont work, its ridiculous" wont cut it as a reasonable response to this OP and other posters

---------

here are my facts on implied contract law:

i hope you understand implied contract law. (google implied contracts)

----------

implied contract means,


A legally enforceable agreement that arises from conduct, assumed intentions, some relationship of the immediate parties, or the application of the legal principle of equity.

A contract is implied when a party knowingly accepts a benefit (like parking) from another party in circumstances where the benefit cannot be considered a gift. Therefore, the party accepting the benefit is under a legal obligation to give fair value for the benefit (benefit like parking) received.

---------

-------------- several large signs posted on property -----------

Parking at this Bar is not a free gift, except if one is a customer or engaged in official government
business with the owner of this property, all others agree to pay a $50 an hour land use fee when parking
or get a warrant. *****NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL*****

sounds like a reasonable contract offer to me...

--------

Do you think a judge would rule police officers can be billed for parking in a parking lot? Absolutely not.

You can define any word you want "contract law". Common sense is the prevailing factor. That is the most "reasonable response".

Also, when you say "you and your dept." you are wrong. I actually wish you were right but reality is tough thing to shake. For some of us anyway.lol