BiznessAssnPrez
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
Washington state.
I am the president of a business association on a private road, which the city has grown around. There are 29 business properties on the private road.
We are in the city limits, and are subject to city laws and taxes.
The city is wary of taking over the ownership of the street, as they say they can't be sure of how well it was built (the ballast, or foundation of the roadway), and they don't want to take over a road that will incur the cost of repaving soon.
The city has assured us that they don't use our private road, yet we see city vehicles taking short-cuts along our private road, and a public school's baseball field and a pedestrian entrance are from our private road.
My thoughts:
The road has been in place for over twenty years, and it isn't failing. I think it has withstood the test of time, so the city shouldn't be concerned about that.
Also, I don't expect any property owners are going to ask for payment, such as may be common in eminent domain situations.
We just want the city to recognize this road as commonly used by them and other city residents, and for them to police and maintain it. We business owners aren't in the road business.
What other arguments or precedents should we bring up?
Washington state.
I am the president of a business association on a private road, which the city has grown around. There are 29 business properties on the private road.
We are in the city limits, and are subject to city laws and taxes.
The city is wary of taking over the ownership of the street, as they say they can't be sure of how well it was built (the ballast, or foundation of the roadway), and they don't want to take over a road that will incur the cost of repaving soon.
The city has assured us that they don't use our private road, yet we see city vehicles taking short-cuts along our private road, and a public school's baseball field and a pedestrian entrance are from our private road.
My thoughts:
The road has been in place for over twenty years, and it isn't failing. I think it has withstood the test of time, so the city shouldn't be concerned about that.
Also, I don't expect any property owners are going to ask for payment, such as may be common in eminent domain situations.
We just want the city to recognize this road as commonly used by them and other city residents, and for them to police and maintain it. We business owners aren't in the road business.
What other arguments or precedents should we bring up?