I found this:What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? La
If an initial determination of custody has been made in Family Court, can the Native American parent decide later he/she wants Tribal court involved?
Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Judicial Codes, Title 8 - Domestic RelationsProceedings to award custody may be reopened upon application of the parent, nearest blood relative, or either clan, or by the Court when it appears that a person to whom custody has been awarded is no longer able to care responsibly for the child.
I live in an area that is heavily invested in Tribal Law (6-7 large reservation, large % of Native American in the population). Tribal Law is federal law, so simple answer is yes it is possible. Best suggestion is get an attorney who is well versed in Native American/Tribal laws governing child custody/visitation.What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? La
If an initial determination of custody has been made in Family Court, can the Native American parent decide later he/she wants Tribal court involved?
I stand corrected. I dealt with the whole Tribal vs. Non-Tribal from a law enforcement side, not a family law/civil law side.no, tribal law is not federal law. There is tribal law and there is federal law. Federal law is applicable on tribal lands for certain things but in others, federal law is set aside and tribal law takes precedence.
the question not asked or answered is: do the people live on tribal lands or not.
Tribal lands, although often called a sovereign nation are actually more of a sovereign state within the US. Federal laws generally apply where tribal law is not given precedence. State laws of the state the tribal lands are within generally are irrelevant.
No, none of them ever have.no, tribal law is not federal law. There is tribal law and there is federal law. Federal law is applicable on tribal lands for certain things but in others, federal law is set aside and tribal law takes precedence.
the question not asked or answered is: do the people live on tribal lands or not.
Tribal lands, although often called a sovereign nation are actually more of a sovereign state within the US. Federal laws generally apply where tribal law is not given precedence. State laws of the state the tribal lands are within generally are irrelevant.
Are we talking custody of two bio parents--one registered as a Native American (or on Native American rolls) and one not Native?No, none of them ever have.
this is the federal definition of Indian lands:Section 3. Jurisdiction. The Coushatta Court shall have jurisdiction over marriages and divorces made in accordance with Coushatta custom of the members of the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana or members of other Tribes residing within the territorial jurisdiction of the Tribe.
Except as otherwise provided in sections 1154 and 1156 of this title, the term “Indian country”, as used in this chapter, means
(a) all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and, including rights-of-way running through the reservation,
(b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States whether within the original or subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a state, and
(c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same.
Actually it does when dealing with CHILDREN of Native Americans who may be placed in foster care or outside the custody of their parents. What other circumstances it applies to, I do not know but I know it definitely applies there.as far as I know, tribal law does not apply outside of tribal lands. At that point, NA (native Americans) are simply residents of the state they live in.
from the section of law provided previously (and it does deal with child custody as well):
this is the federal definition of Indian lands:
We have also seen multiple examples of it applying to children, on these forums.Actually it does when dealing with CHILDREN of Native Americans who may be placed in foster care or outside the custody of their parents. What other circumstances it applies to, I do not know but I know it definitely applies there.