bogusattorneys
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? PA
I am not an attorney - I am a lay person. The following was taken straight from a PA County's Prothonatary’s Public Records. It should also be pointed out that the original document was handwritten on a yellow, lined, legal pad and it fit all on one page. The Plaintiff was told by their attorney they MUST sign it and that the Court could force their home to be sold if they did not sign (coercion and duress anyone?)
I would appreciate any feedback on this post. Do you think this is a legal and enforceable agreement/contract?
All Counts Divorce Master in a major county in PA. She is publicly claiming she will testify to the Court that the following is a legal agreement:
____________
"Plaintiff n Defendant 10/24/2011
Parties agree:
1. H gets house
2. W gets 83,000 w/n 60 days, but if bank takes longer for loan, w/n time set by bank.
3. W gets ½ gas well.
Payments/royalties
4. W gets stuff on her list.
5. W gets her pension.
6. Each keeps everything else they have.
7. No alimony, no counsel fees."
______________
Then there are the following signatures:
Plaintiff and Defendant signatures
Plaintiff's Attorney - the one who wrote this!!
Defendant's Attorney
That's It.
So the above is all that is written on this handwritten document.
Even if this proposal should have been an agreement - it would have already been voided because of actions that were taken after this was written. And the Defendant failed to meet the deadline of point number 1.
Also note - there is no "heading" it doesn't clearly identify what the handwritten proposal is for Isn’t this vital for a contract to be legally enforceable? Can someone please clarify?
How about the professional use of the words "stuff" and "gas well" and "no legal fees"? "No legal fees" could be interpreter as meaning there will be no attorney fees at all. Would you want to hire the attorney that wrote this?
Another PFA Attorney piped in and said that the legal system is trying to be more informal and that the word "stuff" is what the industry is trying to now conform to. Uhhh....wrong! The minute the word "stuff" can be used to describe possessions and debt is the minute the entire legal system stops earning money.
WHY WOULD ANYONE NEED A LAWYER OR ATTORNEY IF ALL? HEY ALL YOU NEED IS A PIECE OF LEGAL YELLOW PAPER AND A PEN AND SOPHOMORIC WORDS LIKE "STUFF"!!! THE REASON WHY YOU HIRE AN ATTORNEY IS BECAUSE OF THE LEGALESE. NO ATTORNEY WANTS TO SEE THE INDUSTRY MAINSTREAM ITS LANGUAGE. CREDIT CARD CONTRACTS SIMPLIFIED? YES. BUT DIVORCE LEGAL TERMS SIMPLIFIED? NO WAY IN HELL.
After doing some of my own research - According to the PA Contract Laws I can find a hundred reasons why this would not be considered a contract or an agreement that can be legally enforced.
These include but are not limited to:
Parole Evidence Rule
Ambiguity - IT IS FILLED WITH AMBIGUITY!!
Unconscionable Contract
The Legal definition of "The Elements of A Contract"
Time Frame was not upheld therefore it can be considered "Termination of An Offer"
Where contracts do not involve the sale of goods, acceptance must comply exactly with the requirements of...
Rejection and Counter Offers
Offeree's Conduct
Promissory Estoppel
WOULD LOVE ANY INPUT!!!
I am not an attorney - I am a lay person. The following was taken straight from a PA County's Prothonatary’s Public Records. It should also be pointed out that the original document was handwritten on a yellow, lined, legal pad and it fit all on one page. The Plaintiff was told by their attorney they MUST sign it and that the Court could force their home to be sold if they did not sign (coercion and duress anyone?)
I would appreciate any feedback on this post. Do you think this is a legal and enforceable agreement/contract?
All Counts Divorce Master in a major county in PA. She is publicly claiming she will testify to the Court that the following is a legal agreement:
____________
"Plaintiff n Defendant 10/24/2011
Parties agree:
1. H gets house
2. W gets 83,000 w/n 60 days, but if bank takes longer for loan, w/n time set by bank.
3. W gets ½ gas well.
Payments/royalties
4. W gets stuff on her list.
5. W gets her pension.
6. Each keeps everything else they have.
7. No alimony, no counsel fees."
______________
Then there are the following signatures:
Plaintiff and Defendant signatures
Plaintiff's Attorney - the one who wrote this!!
Defendant's Attorney
That's It.
So the above is all that is written on this handwritten document.
Even if this proposal should have been an agreement - it would have already been voided because of actions that were taken after this was written. And the Defendant failed to meet the deadline of point number 1.
Also note - there is no "heading" it doesn't clearly identify what the handwritten proposal is for Isn’t this vital for a contract to be legally enforceable? Can someone please clarify?
How about the professional use of the words "stuff" and "gas well" and "no legal fees"? "No legal fees" could be interpreter as meaning there will be no attorney fees at all. Would you want to hire the attorney that wrote this?
Another PFA Attorney piped in and said that the legal system is trying to be more informal and that the word "stuff" is what the industry is trying to now conform to. Uhhh....wrong! The minute the word "stuff" can be used to describe possessions and debt is the minute the entire legal system stops earning money.
WHY WOULD ANYONE NEED A LAWYER OR ATTORNEY IF ALL? HEY ALL YOU NEED IS A PIECE OF LEGAL YELLOW PAPER AND A PEN AND SOPHOMORIC WORDS LIKE "STUFF"!!! THE REASON WHY YOU HIRE AN ATTORNEY IS BECAUSE OF THE LEGALESE. NO ATTORNEY WANTS TO SEE THE INDUSTRY MAINSTREAM ITS LANGUAGE. CREDIT CARD CONTRACTS SIMPLIFIED? YES. BUT DIVORCE LEGAL TERMS SIMPLIFIED? NO WAY IN HELL.
After doing some of my own research - According to the PA Contract Laws I can find a hundred reasons why this would not be considered a contract or an agreement that can be legally enforced.
These include but are not limited to:
Parole Evidence Rule
Ambiguity - IT IS FILLED WITH AMBIGUITY!!
Unconscionable Contract
The Legal definition of "The Elements of A Contract"
Time Frame was not upheld therefore it can be considered "Termination of An Offer"
Where contracts do not involve the sale of goods, acceptance must comply exactly with the requirements of...
Rejection and Counter Offers
Offeree's Conduct
Promissory Estoppel
WOULD LOVE ANY INPUT!!!